...
首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Biology >Tools in waterfowl reserve management: effects of intermittent hunting adjacent to a shooting-free core area
【24h】

Tools in waterfowl reserve management: effects of intermittent hunting adjacent to a shooting-free core area

机译:水禽保护区管理中的工具:在无射击核心区域附近间歇性狩猎的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We explored how waterfowl in a large Danish coastal wetland responded to one day of marsh shooting at intervals of three weeks (1998), two weeks (1999), and one week (2000 and 2001). Shooting took place around sunset on a section of salt marsh that usually is part of a large shooting-free refuge. The behavioural response of waterfowl was recorded, and all waterfowl were counted on the day of the hunt and on the first and second day after each hunt. The wildfowl responded to the first 1-7 shots by moving into the open water parts of the refuge (dabbling ducks) or to sites > 8 km away (geese and waders). When the salt marsh was flooded early in autumn 2001, wigeon Anas penelope, teal A. crecca and lapwing Vanellus vanellus restricted their response tomovements to other non-hunted parts of the salt marsh. On the first day after the hunts, mallard A. platyrhynchos occurred in significantly lower numbers both on the adjacent shallow and on the salt marsh. Wigeon numbers on the shallows were not affected by shooting, though they returned in lower numbers to the salt marsh on the first day after the hunts in 1998-2000, but not after the hunts in 2001. A similar pattern was observed in teal numbers on the salt marsh. We conclude: 1) that shooting lead toshort-term displacements of dabbling ducks, 2) that the response of wigeon and teal varied depending on prevailing conditions on the salt marsh, 3) that intermittent regulation of marsh shooting was a management tool that ensured that waterfowl continued to exploit the area shot over on days when no shooting took place, and 4) that the relatively weak responses were linked to the existence of an extensive refuge adjacent to the area with marsh shooting.
机译:我们探索了丹麦大型沿海湿地中的水禽如何以三周(1998年),两周(1999年)和一周(2000年和2001年)的间隔响应一天的沼泽射击。日落时分左右在盐沼的一部分上开枪,这通常是大型的无射击避难所的一部分。记录水禽的行为反应,并在狩猎当天以及每次狩猎后的第一天和第二天对所有水禽进行计数。野禽对前1到7枪的反应是将其移入避难所的开阔水域(鸭鸭子)或移至8公里外的地方(鹅和涉禽)。当盐沼在2001秋季初被洪水淹没时,韦纳斯·阿纳斯·佩内洛普,蓝绿色A. crecca和田wing Vanellus vanellus限制了它们对盐沼其他未捕猎部分的运动响应。狩猎后的第一天,绿头野鸭(A. platyrhynchos)在邻近的浅滩和盐沼中的发病率均显着降低。浅滩上的Wigeon数不受射影的影响,尽管它们在1998-2000年狩猎后的第一天以较低的数量返回盐沼,但在2001年狩猎后没有。盐沼。我们得出以下结论:1)射击会导致鸭鸭的短期移位; 2)盐沼上的流行条件导致wigeon和蓝绿色的响应发生变化; 3)间歇性调节沼泽射击是一种管理工具,可确保水鸟在没有枪击事件发生的那几天继续利用被枪击的区域,并且4)相对较弱的反应与附近有沼泽射击的大避难所有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号