首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Effect of different carbon sources on aerobic storage by activated sludge
【24h】

Effect of different carbon sources on aerobic storage by activated sludge

机译:不同碳源对活性污泥好氧贮藏的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study of substrate removal by real activated sludge with several synthetic substrates (acetate, ethanol, glutamic acid) and wastewater (raw and filtered) was carried out. Substrate, stored compounds (polyhydroxyalkanoates, PHA and internal carbohydrates), ammonia and oxygen uptake rate (OUR) were analytically determined. Poly hydroxybutyrate (PHB) was stored when the substrate was acetate or ethanol, while no appreciable formation of storage compound was detected using glutamic acid. A low amount of PHB was also formed in tests with raw and filtered wastewater which was probably mainly due to its acetate content. As far as the sum of storage and growth (indirectly estimated through ammonia consumption) did not match the overall solids formation, other unidentified mechanisms of substrate removal were likely to occur (biosorption, accumulation and/or storage of unidentified compounds). ASM3 and two derived models were used in the interpretation of experimental data with reference to synthetic substrates. With reference to synthetic substrates ASM3 can well describe the experimental data only assuming a stored product formation much higher than the analytically detected one, whereas the model that assumes a parallel growth and storage on the substrate can well describe the observed stored product profile only assuming a direct contribution of growth much higher than estimated from ammonia consumption. The model that assumes an accumulation/biosorption stage as first step of substrate removal can better describe the whole experimentally observed behaviour, However as well as in ASM3 this implies that some fraction of removed COD is still unidentified. With reference to real wastewater where the different phenomena were mixed up due to the presence of several substrates, the different models gave similar results. [References: 23]
机译:进行了使用几种合成底物(乙酸盐,乙醇,谷氨酸)和废水(粗滤和过滤)的实际活性污泥去除底物的研究。通过分析确定底物,储存的化合物(聚羟基链烷酸酯,PHA和内部碳水化合物),氨和氧的吸收率(OUR)。当底物是乙酸盐或乙醇时,聚羟基丁酸酯(PHB)被存储,而使用谷氨酸则未检测到明显的存储化合物形成。在未经处理和经过过滤的废水的测试中还形成了少量的PHB,这可能主要是由于其乙酸盐含量。只要存储和增长的总和(通过氨的消耗间接估算)与总固体形成不匹配,就可能发生其他未知的底物去除机制(生物吸收,累积和/或存储未知的化合物)。 ASM3和两个派生模型用于参考合成底物解释实验数据。关于合成基质,ASM3仅在假设储存产物的形成远高于分析检测到的产物的情况下才能很好地描述实验数据,而假设在基质上平行生长和储存的模型仅在假定了增长的直接贡献远高于氨消耗量的估计。假定积累/生物吸附阶段为去除底物的第一步的模型可以更好地描述整个实验观察到的行为,但是,以及在ASM3中,这意味着去除的COD的一部分仍未确定。对于实际废水,由于存在几种底物而使不同的现象混合在一起,不同的模型给出了相似的结果。 [参考:23]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号