首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 2: prosthetic technique and clinical maintenance in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.
【24h】

Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 2: prosthetic technique and clinical maintenance in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.

机译:在上颌无牙的义齿中进行植入物治疗。第2部分:1986年至1987年以及15年后恢复的两个患者队列的修复技术和临床维护。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Implant treatment using osseointegrated implants has been performed for more than 40 years, but limited knowledge is available on how treatment outcomes have changed over time. The aim of this study was to report and compare the prosthetic treatment outcomes from two patient cohorts provided with fixed implant prostheses in the edentulous maxilla between 1986 and 1987 (early) and 2001 to 2004 (late) at the same clinic. Materials and Methods: The two groups of patients comprised 76 and 109 edentulous patients consecutively provided with 450 and 670 Branemark System implants and fixed screw-retained prostheses, respectively. Both groups were followed for 5 years with regard to prosthetic treatment, clinical maintenance, and complications. Results: Altogether, 37 patients (20%) were lost to follow-up during the 5 years, and more patients were noncompliant in the late group (P < .05). Prosthetic treatment was performed using significantly less chair time in the late group (P < .05), and 22 and 68 patients were followed for 5 years without any reported complications in the early and late groups, respectively (P < .05). The 5-year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 97.1% in the early group and 100.0% in the late group. Patients in the late group presented fewer problems with diction and veneer fractures, and fewer patients had their prostheses temporarily removed for adjustments (P < .05). Conclusion: Prosthetic treatment and maintenance of implant-supported fixed prostheses improved significantly between the groups. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:356-362.
机译:目的:使用骨整合植入物进行植入物治疗已经进行了40多年,但是关于治疗效果如何随时间变化的知识有限。这项研究的目的是报告和比较1986年至1987年(早期)和2001年至2004年(晚期)同一诊所在无牙颌上颌的两个无牙种植假体的患者队列的假体治疗结果。材料和方法:两组患者分别包括76例和109例无牙的患者,分别提供450枚和670枚Branemark System植入物和固定的螺钉固定假体。两组均在修复,临床维持和并发症方面进行了5年的随访。结果:在这5年中,共有37例患者(20%)丢失了随访,在晚期组中有更多患者不依从(P <.05)。在后期组中,假肢治疗的坐席时间明显减少(P <.05),并且对22和68例患者进行了5年的随访,早期组和晚期组均无任何并发症发生(P <.05)。早期组的5年假体累积存活率为97.1%,晚期组为100.0%。晚期组的患者出现了干口和单板骨折的问题较少,而为进行调整而临时取下假体的患者也较少(P <.05)。结论:两组之间,植入物支持的固定假体的假体治疗和维持显着改善。 Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24:356-362。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号