首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Regenerative Needs Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures in Compromised and Noncompromised Extraction Sockets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
【24h】

Regenerative Needs Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures in Compromised and Noncompromised Extraction Sockets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

机译:在受损和未受损的拔牙窝中进行牙槽Ridge保留程序后的再生需求:锥束计算机断层扫描研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity for additional regenerative procedures following healing of compromised and noncompromised extraction sockets with alveolar ridge preservation procedures through the use of virtual implant imaging software. Materials and Methods: The cohort was comprised of 87 consecutive patients subjected to a single maxillary tooth extraction with an alveolar ridge preservation procedure for subsequent implant placement. Patients were divided into two main groups based on the integrity of the buccal bone plate following teeth extraction. Patients in the compromised socket (CS) group (n = 52) had partial or complete buccal bone plate loss, and patients in the noncompromised socket (NCS) group (n = 35) exhibited no bone loss of their socket walls following tooth extraction. Following 4 to 6 months of healing, all patients had a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Root-formed implants were placed virtually in an ideal prosthetic position. The number of implants per group and location (anterior, premolar, molar) exhibiting exposed buccal implant surface was calculated. Results: In the CS group, 5 out of 19 anterior implants (26.3%), 4 out of 14 premolar implants (28.5%), and 7 out of 19 molar implants (36.8%) had exposed buccal surfaces. In the NCS group, 4 out of 9 anterior implants (44.4%), 2 out of 9 premolar implants (22.2%), and 4 out of 17 molar implants (23.5%) had exposed buccal surfaces. There were no statistically significant differences for intragroup and intergroup comparisons (chi(2) test, P > .05). Conclusion: This study failed to find statistically significant differences in the frequency of implants with exposed buccal surfaces placed virtually, following treatment of compromised and noncompromised sockets. A high proportion (22% to 44%) of sites had implants that potentially needed additional regenerative procedures.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过使用虚拟种植体成像软件评估受损和不妥协的拔牙窝采用牙槽保存程序后,进行其他再生程序的必要性。材料和方法:该队列由87位连续患者组成,这些患者接受了单颗上颌牙拔除并保留了牙槽,用于随后的植入物植入。根据拔牙后颊骨板的完整性将患者分为两个主要组。牙周受损(CS)组(n = 52)的患者部分或全部颊侧骨板丢失,而未受损牙周(NCS)组(n = 35)的患者拔牙后未显示其牙槽壁的骨丢失。在愈合4至6个月后,所有患者均接受了锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)研究。根状植入物实际上放置在理想​​的修复位置。计算出暴露的颊侧种植体表面的每组和位置(前,前磨牙,磨牙)的种植体数量。结果:在CS组中,19个前牙种植体中有5个(26.3%),14个前磨牙种植体中有4个(28.5%)和19个磨牙种植体中有7个(36.8%)具有颊侧暴露的表面。在NCS组中,9个前牙种植体中有4个(44.4%),9个前磨牙种植体中有2个(22.2%)和17个磨牙种植体中有4个(23.5%)的颊侧暴露。组间和组间比较没有统计学上的显着差异(chi(2)检验,P> .05)。结论:这项研究未能发现在治疗受损和未受损的牙槽窝后,实际上暴露的颊面暴露的植入物的频率在统计学上有显着差异。高比例(22%至44%)的部位植入了可能需要额外再生程序的植入物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号