首页> 外文期刊>Vision Research: An International Journal in Visual Science >The pupil is faster than the corneal reflection (CR): Are video based pupil-CR eye trackers suitable for studying detailed dynamics of eye movements?
【24h】

The pupil is faster than the corneal reflection (CR): Are video based pupil-CR eye trackers suitable for studying detailed dynamics of eye movements?

机译:瞳孔比角膜反射(CR)快:基于视频的瞳孔CR眼动仪是否适合研究详细的眼动动力学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most modern video eye trackers use the p-CR (pupil minus CR) technique to deal with small relative movements between the eye tracker camera and the eye. We question whether the p-CR technique is appropriate to investigate saccade dynamics. In two experiments we investigated the dynamics of pupil, CR and gaze signals obtained from a standard SMI Hi-Speed eye tracker. We found many differences between the pupil and the CR signals. Differences concern timing of the saccade onset, saccade peak velocity and post-saccadic oscillation (PSO). We also obtained that pupil peak velocities were higher than CR peak velocities. Saccades in the eye trackers' gaze signal (that is constructed from p-CR) appear to be excessive versions of saccades in the pupil signal. We conclude that the pupil-CR technique is not suitable for studying detailed dynamics of eye movements. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:大多数现代视频眼动仪都使用p-CR(瞳孔减CR)技术来处理眼动仪相机和眼睛之间的微小相对运动。我们质疑p-CR技术是否适合研究扫视动力学。在两个实验中,我们研究了从标准SMI Hi-Speed眼动仪获得的瞳孔,CR和注视信号的动态。我们发现瞳孔和CR信号之间存在许多差异。差异涉及扫视开始的时间,扫视峰值速度和声后震荡(PSO)。我们还获得了瞳孔峰值速度高于CR峰值速度。眼动仪的凝视信号中的扫视(由p-CR构成)似乎是瞳孔信号中扫视的过度版本。我们得出结论,瞳孔CR技术不适合研究眼球运动的详细动态。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号