首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Surgery >An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones
【24h】

An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones

机译:5.5 mm锁定加压钢板固定与4.5 mm锁定加压钢板固定的截骨马第三掌骨的体外生物力学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

ObjectivesTo compare the monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a 5.5-mm-broad locking compression plate (5.5 LCP) fixation with a 4.5-mm-broad locking compression plate (4.5 LCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones.Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a middiaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation.Animal PopulationFifteen pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones.MethodsFifteen pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (5 pairs each) for (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing, and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. An 8-hole, 5.5 LCP was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair and an 8-hole, 4.5 LCP was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair using a combination of cortical and locking screws. All plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had middiaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group with significance set at P <.05.ResultsMean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load, and failure bending moment, under 4-point bending, single cycle to failure, of the 5.5 LCP fixation were significantly greater than those of the 4.5 LCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure in 4-point bending of the 5.5 LCP fixation (170,535 +/- 19,166) was significantly greater than that of the 4.5 LCP fixation (129,629 +/- 14,054). Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load under torsional testing, single cycle to failure was significantly greater for the broad 5.5 LCP fixation compared with the 4.5 LCP fixation. In single cycle to failure under torsion, the mean +/- SD values for the 5.5 LCP and the 4.5 LCP fixation techniques, respectively, were: yield load, 151.4 +/- 19.6 and 97.6 +/- 12.1 N m; composite rigidity, 790.3 +/- 58.1 and 412.3 +/- 28.1 N m/rad; and failure load: 162.1 +/- 20.2 and 117.9 +/- 14.6 N m.ConclusionThe 5.5 LCP was superior to the 4.5 LCP in resisting static overload forces (palmarodorsal 4-point bending and torsional) and in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4-point bending.Clinical RelevanceThese in vitro study results may provide information to aid in selection of an LCP for repair of equine long bone fractures.
机译:目的比较5.5毫米宽的锁定加压板(5.5 LCP)固定与4.5毫米宽的锁定加压板(4.5 LCP)固定的单调生物力学性能和疲劳寿命,以修复截骨的马第三掌骨(MC3)。研究设计对成对的尸体马MC3与dia骨中部截骨术的体外生物力学测试,通过2种方法中的1种进行稳定化固定。动物种群15对成年马尸体MC3骨骼分为15对马MC3,分为3组(每组5对) )(1)进行4点弯曲单周期失效测试,(2)4点弯曲循环疲劳测试以及(3)扭转单周期失效测试。使用皮质和锁定螺钉的组合,将8孔5.5 LCP应用于每对1个随机选择的骨骼的背侧表面,并将8孔4.5 LCP背面对每个对侧骨骼应用背侧骨。所有板和螺钉均使用标准ASIF技术施加。所有MC3骨均进行了中dia骨截骨术。使用配对t检验在各组中比较每种方法的平均测试变量值,显着性设置为P <.05。结果在4点下的平均屈服载荷,屈服弯矩,复合刚度,破坏载荷和破坏弯矩5.5 LCP固定的弯曲(单周期失效)显着大于4.5 LCP固定的弯曲。 5.5 LCP固定(170,535 +/- 19,166)的4点弯曲平均失效周期显着大于4.5 LCP固定(129,629 +/- 14,054)。 5.5 LCP固定较之4.5 LCP固定,在扭转试验下的平均屈服载荷,平均复合材料刚度和平均破坏载荷,单次失效循环明显更大。在扭转下的单循环失效中,5.5 LCP和4.5 LCP固定技术的平均+/- SD值分别为:屈服载荷,151.4 +/- 19.6和97.6 +/- 12.1 N m;复合刚性790.3 +/- 58.1和412.3 +/- 28.1 N m / rad;结论:5.5 LCP在抵抗静态过载力(手掌4点弯曲和扭转)和抵抗手掌4下的循环疲劳方面优于4.5 LCP,且抗疲劳载荷为162.1 +/- 20.2和117.9 +/- 14.6 N m。这些临床研究结果可能为选择LCP修复马长骨骨折提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号