首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Surgery >An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a Locking Compression Plate Fixation and Kerf Cut Cylinder Fixation for Ventral Arthrodesis of the Fourth and the Fifth Equine Cervical Vertebrae
【24h】

An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a Locking Compression Plate Fixation and Kerf Cut Cylinder Fixation for Ventral Arthrodesis of the Fourth and the Fifth Equine Cervical Vertebrae

机译:第四和第五种马颈椎腹侧关节固定术的加压加压板固定和切口切开气瓶固定的体外生物力学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivesTo (1) define mechanical properties in flexion, extension, and left lateral bending of cadaveric equine 4th and 5th cervical (C4-C5) articulations, (2) compare biomechanical properties of C4-C5 when stabilized with a kerf cut cylinder (KCC) compared with a ventrally placed 4.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP).Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical investigation.Sample PopulationCadaveric adult equine cervical vertebral columns (n=54).MethodsCervical vertebrae aged by horse dentition and size measured from radiographs were divided into 3 age groups then randomly allocated to 3 groups. The C4-C5 articulation was treated differently in each of the groups: KCC group; KCC-implanted LCP group; 8-hole 4.5 mm LCP implanted and intact group; no implant. Specimens were randomly subdivided into 1 of 3 loading conditions, before testing to failure under 4-point bending. Stiffness, yield bending moment, failure bending moment, and failure mode were recorded. General linear models were performed to analyze associations between biomechanical properties and test variables.ResultsAll specimens failed at the C4-C5 intervertebral articulation. The cervical vertebrae with the LCP construct had significantly higher stiffness, yield bending moment, and failure bending moment than the KCC-implanted cervical vertebrae. Failure modes differed between groups and varied with loading direction: KCC group, fractures of C5 associated with the KCC were common; LCP group, screw pull out or fractures (of C4 and C5 bodies, during extension and the caudal aspect of C4 during left lateral bending) were common; and intact group, subluxations were most common.ConclusionsIn this model, LCP constructs had superior biomechanical properties compared with KCC constructs. Further research investigating the effect of repetitive loading is indicated.
机译:目的要(1)定义尸体马第4和第5颈(C4-C5)关节的弯曲,伸展和左侧弯曲的力学性能,(2)比较用切口切开的气瓶(KCC)稳定时C4-C5的生物力学性能与腹侧放置的4.5 mm锁定加压板(LCP)进行比较。然后随机分配到3组。在每个组中,对C4-C5关节的处理都不同:植入KCC的LCP组; 8孔4.5 mm LCP植入完整组;没有植入物。在4点弯曲测试失败之前,将样本随机细分为3种加载条件中的1种。记录刚度,屈服弯曲力矩,破坏弯曲力矩和破坏模式。进行了一般线性模型分析,以分析生物力学性能与测试变量之间的关联。结果所有样本均在C4-C5椎间关节处失败。与植入KCC的颈椎相比,具有LCP构造的颈椎具有更高的刚度,屈服弯矩和破坏弯矩。各组之间的破坏模式不同,并且随载荷方向而变化:KCC组,与KCC相关的C5骨折很常见; LCP组,螺钉拔出或骨折(C4和C5体在伸展过程中以及C4的尾端在左侧弯曲过程中很常见);结论:在该模型中,LCP构建体的生物力学性能优于KCC构建体。指出了进一步研究重复荷载作用的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号