首页> 外文期刊>VGB PowerTech >Multi-pollutant control technology assessment: Circulating fluidised bed scrubber vs. spray dryer absorber
【24h】

Multi-pollutant control technology assessment: Circulating fluidised bed scrubber vs. spray dryer absorber

机译:多污染物控制技术评估:循环流化床洗涤器与喷雾干燥器吸收器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The converging US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules for reducing mercury, metals, acid gases and organic compounds (Mercury and Air Toxics Standards or MATS), Regional Haze (RH) and SO_2, NO_x as well as particulates (Cross-State Air Pollution Rule or CSAPR) have ratcheted up the pressure on coal-fired generators to quickly reduce a variety of pollutants. The EPA estimates that CSAPR alone requires more than 3,000 units at more than 1,000 plants located in 28 states to reduce emissions that cross state lines and contribute to ground-level ozone and fine particle pollution. CSPAR Phase 1 compliance takes effect this year while MATS and RH reduction are ongoing programmes.
机译:统一的美国环境保护局(EPA)规则,旨在减少汞,金属,酸性气体和有机化合物(汞和空气有毒物质标准或MATS),区域雾度(RH)和SO_2,NO_x以及颗粒物(跨州空气污染Rule(CSAPR)加大了燃煤发电机的压力,以迅速减少各种污染物。 EPA估计,仅CSAPR要求位于28个州的1000多家工厂中的3,000多个装置,以减少跨州界线的排放并造成地面臭氧和细颗粒物污染。 CSPAR第一阶段合规性将于今年生效,而MATS和RH降低仍在进行中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号