首页> 外文期刊>VINE >Building knowledge for innovation management: The experience of the Umanlab research team
【24h】

Building knowledge for innovation management: The experience of the Umanlab research team

机译:建立创新管理知识:Umanlab研究团队的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this research is to evaluate the conditions of production of methodological knowledge on innovation management. It seeks to present the experience of an applied research team working with practitioners of R&D by means of an inter-disciplinary research team in social sciences. The theoretical framework aims to present two approaches for knowledge production: collaboration with practitioners and interdisciplinary research in social science. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology is a case study focused on the various forms of collaborative research. While the literature mainly considers only one form of collaborative research, the author distinguishes between mono-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary collaborative research on one hand, and between mono-partner and multi-partner collaborative research on the other, leading to four typical research situations. The paper examines empirically the rigor-relevance debate as seen as the researchers and the practitioners. Findings: The findings bring to light different criteria that influence the production of knowledge, within the rigor-relevance dilemma, according to the collaborative research situations and the epistemological posture of researchers from various disciplines. Practical implications: The practical implications concern the conditions under which a research program in social sciences can reach both rigor and relevance and produce methodological knowledge. It provides a guide for effective collaboration between social science academics and managers. Social implications: This research enlightens the conditions of collaboration between the academic world and the industrial world, which is key to foster innovation, particularly in social sciences. Originality/value: The value of the paper is to illustrate that collaborative research requires a "boundary organization" to create new knowledge, which is a type of task force capable of mediation between academia, industrials and consultants.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估创新管理方法论知识的生产条件。它旨在通过社会科学跨学科研究团队,介绍应用研究团队与R&D从业人员合作的经验。该理论框架旨在提出两种知识生产方法:与从业人员的合作以及社会科学的跨学科研究。设计/方法论/方法:该方法论是一个案例研究,专注于各种形式的协作研究。尽管文献主要只考虑一种形式的合作研究,但作者一方面区分了单学科合作研究和跨学科合作研究,另一方面区分了单伙伴合作研究和多伙伴合作研究,导致了四种典型的研究情况。 。本文从研究者和从业者的角度,从经验上考察了严格相关性的争论。研究结果:根据合作研究的情况和各学科研究人员的认识论立场,研究结果揭示了在严格相关的困境内影响知识产生的不同标准。实际意义:实际意义涉及社会科学研究计划可以达到严格和相关性并产生方法论知识的条件。它为社会科学学者和管理人员之间的有效合作提供了指南。社会影响:这项研究启发了学术界和工业界之间合作的条件,这是促进创新的关键,特别是在社会科学领域。原创性/价值:本文的价值在于说明协作研究需要“边界组织”来创造新知识,这是一种能够在学术界,产业界和顾问之间进行调解的工作队。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号