首页> 外文期刊>VGB PowerTech >Ultra Supercritical Pulverised Fuel Combustion versus Ultra Supercritical Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion: Ultra Supercritical Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion Comes out on Top?
【24h】

Ultra Supercritical Pulverised Fuel Combustion versus Ultra Supercritical Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion: Ultra Supercritical Circulating Fluidised Bed Combustion Comes out on Top?

机译:超超临界粉状燃料燃烧与超超临界循环流化床燃烧:超超临界循环流化床燃烧脱颖而出吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The advantages and disadvantages of USC CFBC and USC PFC were compared, The potential disadvantages of USC CFBC are easily counteracted, An advantage of USC CFBC is the high fuel flexibility, although this is less than anticipated and usually limited by the specification of a project, The fuel flexibility of CFBC allows for (co-)combustion of pet cokes and suitable biomass like (dry) wood. PFC may follow grate firing and slag tap furnaces on the path of history.
机译:比较了USC CFBC和USC PFC的优缺点,USC CFBC的潜在缺点很容易消除,USC CFBC的优点是燃料灵活性高,尽管这比预期的要少,并且通常受项目规格的限制, CFBC的燃料灵活性允许宠物焦炭和合适的生物质(如(干)木材)进行(共)燃烧。在历史的过程中,PFC可能会跟随炉排燃烧和排渣炉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号