首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Worms in smallholder livestock systems: Technologies and practices that make a difference
【24h】

Worms in smallholder livestock systems: Technologies and practices that make a difference

机译:小农户牲畜系统中的蠕虫:与众不同的技术和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Australian scientists, in partnership with Asian, African and Pacific nations have longstanding interests in applied research on helminth parasite control. Many technologies and practices have been successfully developed to control the parasite problems of smallholder and emerging farmers. This wide range extends from simple herbal remedies to complex, integrated use of chemicals, feeding and breeding. In many cases widespread adoption has been limited by lack of technical support, poor access to input markets and lack of incentives for poorer farmers to seek out and pay for innovations. A further new approach may be required that encompasses the wider production and market environment. The biological, social and economic context of each 'emerging farming system' is different and the matching of technologies to each system requires sound understanding of farmer needs and requirements. Thus, it is essential that farmers, extension workers, and scientists jointly decide what technologies to try, what results mean and, if successful, how to sustain their use. In one Asian example a range of technologies were considered for pig, large ruminant and goat production and parasite control through a participatory process which was also used to agree on what determines sustainability beyond testing. The criteria use to screen technologies and practices were (a) continued availability of inputs including dewormers, (b) dependence on related innovations (e.g. weaning or fencing) and (c) degree of community organisation required (e.g. control of breeding or communal grazing). On this basis deworming with chemicals, especially for Toxocara infection in cattle and buffalo calves following on from supplementary feeding with forages were the most feasible entry points. Further interventions were dependent on changes to the production system, including the introduction of weaning and controlled breeding. Further, the incentives for these production changes could not exist without improved market access and market signals for improved weight and condition. Examples such as this point to the need for stronger multidisciplinary and participatory approaches to parasite control. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:澳大利亚科学家与亚洲,非洲和太平洋国家合作,对蠕虫寄生虫控制的应用研究有着长期的兴趣。已经成功开发了许多技术和实践来控制小农户和新兴农民的寄生虫问题。范围很广,从简单的草药到复杂的化学品综合使用,喂养和育种。在许多情况下,由于缺乏技术支持,进入投入市场的机会不足以及缺乏激励较贫穷的农民寻求创新和为创新付费的动力,使广泛采用受到了限制。可能需要进一步的新方法来涵盖更广泛的生产和市场环境。每个“新兴农业系统”的生物学,社会和经济背景都不尽相同,将技术与每个系统相匹配需要对农民的需求和要求有深刻的了解。因此,至关重要的是,农民,推广人员和科学家们共同决定要尝试的技术,结果的意义以及成功的话,如何维持其使用。在一个亚洲的例子中,考虑了通过参与性过程用于猪,大型反刍动物和山羊生产以及寄生虫控制的一系列技术,这些技术还被用来就决定测试之外的可持续性达成共识。用于筛选技术和实践的标准是(a)持续提供包括驱虫剂在内的投入物;(b)对相关创新的依赖(例如断奶或围栏);以及(c)所需的社区组织程度(例如,控制繁殖或社区放牧) 。在此基础上,对化学物质进行驱虫,特别是对牛和水牛犊的Toxocara感染,补充饲喂草料是最可行的切入点。进一步的干预取决于生产系统的变化,包括引入断奶和控制育种。此外,如果没有改善的市场准入和改善体重和状况的市场信号,就不可能有这些生产变化的动机。诸如此类的例子表明,需要更强大的多学科和参与性方法来控制寄生虫。 (C)2011 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号