...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Experimental and modeling approaches to evaluate different aspects of the efficacy of Targeted Selective Treatment of anthelmintics against sheep parasite nematodes
【24h】

Experimental and modeling approaches to evaluate different aspects of the efficacy of Targeted Selective Treatment of anthelmintics against sheep parasite nematodes

机译:实验和建模方法来评估驱虫药针对绵羊寄生虫线虫的靶向选择性治疗功效的不同方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Maintaining a refugia i.e. a proportion of the population that is not exposed to selection by treatments has been suggested as an alternative to mass treatment in the management of nematode parasites of sheep. Three refugia have been identified: nematodes in untreated hosts, encysted larvae and free-living stages on pastures. Here we tested whether Targeted Selective Treatments (TST) could be relevant in controlling nematode infections and delaying anthelmintic resistance selection. We first conducted a one grazing season experiment to compare all flock treatment (the whole flock was treated monthly) and TST based on monthly excretion eggs and daily weight gain. Nematode burden was higher in TST group, but anthelmintic susceptibility of nematodes was preserved. We then used an individual-based model to evaluate the sustainability of TST on a longer period. The simulation approach indicated that TST20% and TST30% of the flock were efficient both at maintaining resistance at a low level and controlling nematode parasite infections on a mid-term period (i.e. simulation of five grazing seasons). However for an efficient TST, these percentages of treated hosts should be adapted to flock size since the number of nematode parasites exposed to selection increases in large flocks. Our results also showed a high dependence on the timing of treatment i.e. on the size of the refugia constituted by the free-living stages on the pasture
机译:在绵羊的线虫寄生虫的管理中,已建议维持避难所,即不接受治疗选择的人口比例作为大规模治疗的替代方法。已经确定了三种避难所:未经处理的寄主中的线虫,幼虫被包住和牧场上的自由生活阶段。在这里,我们测试了靶向选择性治疗(TST)在控制线虫感染和延迟驱虫抗药性选择方面是否可能相关。我们首先进行了一个放牧季节实验,根据月排卵量和日增重比较所有鸡群的治疗(整个鸡群每月进行一次治疗)和TST。 TST组线虫的负担较高,但保留了线虫的驱虫药敏感性。然后,我们使用了基于个人的模型来评估TST在更长时期内的可持续性。模拟方法表明,在中期,鸡群的TST20%和TST30%既能有效维持较低水平的抗性,又能控制线虫寄生虫感染(即模拟五个放牧季节)。但是,为了获得有效的TST,应根据鸡群的大小调整这些百分比的宿主,因为暴露于选择的线虫寄生虫的数量在大群中会增加。我们的结果还显示出高度依赖于治疗时间,即依赖牧场自由生活阶段构成的避难所的大小

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号