首页> 外文期刊>TurfGrass Trends >Scientists look for ways to improve turf evaluations
【24h】

Scientists look for ways to improve turf evaluations

机译:科学家寻找改善草皮评估的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evaluating turfgrass quality is by no means an exact science. As it stands now, the NTEP results, which are based on Grand Mean scores averaged across three replications at different locations, are the most accurate way to predict how turfgrass cultivars will behave on your course. As with all scientific endeavors, however, we in academia are always looking to refine our evaluation methods to produce even more accuracy than is currently available. That's why several different statistical models arecurrently being tested to see if we can improve on NTEP's accuracy even further in the next five years.
机译:评估草皮草的质量绝不是一门精确的科学。就目前而言,NTEP结果基于不同位置三个重复样本的平均均值得分,是预测草坪草品种在您的病程中表现的最准确方法。与所有科学努力一样,我们在学术界一直在寻求改进我们的评估方法,以产生比当前更高的准确性。因此,目前正在测试几种不同的统计模型,以查看我们能否在未来五年内进一步提高NTEP的准确性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《TurfGrass Trends》 |2002年第8期|共5页
  • 作者

    J.S. Ebdon;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 园艺;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 20:04:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号