首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Microbiology >Evaluation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae diagnostic tests using samples derived from experimentally infected pigs
【24h】

Evaluation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae diagnostic tests using samples derived from experimentally infected pigs

机译:使用源自实验感染猪的样品评估胸膜肺炎放线杆菌诊断测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New serological tests have recently been introduced for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae diagnosis. No information is currently available on how these tests compare regarding the detection of antibodies from subclinically infected pigs. To answer this question, 80 pigs were randomly assigned to experimental groups infected with A. pleuropneumoniae serovars 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15 and a non-inoculated control group. Blood samples and oropharyngeal swabs were collected prior to infection and for 7 consecutive weeks thereafter. Serum samples were tested using the Swinecheck(R) APP ELISA and the Multi-APP ELISA (University of Montreal). All pigs were euthanized at 49 days post-inoculation. Tonsil and lung samples were cultured for isolation and tested by PCR. The Multi-APP ELISA detected seroconversion 1 week earlier than the Swinecheck(R) APP ELISA with the earliest seroconversion detected at 1 week post-infection (serovar 10) and the latest at 3 weeks post-infection (serovar 1). Seroconversion at day 49 was serovar-dependent and varied from 4 (44%) positives detected in the serovar 10 group to 9 positives (100%) detected in the serovar 15 group. Thirty-one pigs were serologically positive for A. pleuropneumoniae at 49 days post-infection and only 15 still carried A. pleuropneumoniae on their tonsils based on PCR results. No cross-reactions were observed when serum samples were cross-tested using the Swinecheck(R) APP ELISA. A. pleuropneumoniae was successfully isolated from the lung of 2 pigs that developed pleuropneumonia, but was not isolated from tonsils due to heavy contamination by the resident flora. This study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the diagnostic tools currently available for detection of A. pleuropneumoniae subclinical infection
机译:最近引入了用于胸膜肺炎放线杆菌诊断的新血清学测试。目前尚无关于这些测试如何比较从亚临床感染的猪中检测抗体的信息。为了回答这个问题,将80头猪随机分为感染胸膜肺炎链球菌1、3、5、7、10、12、15的实验组和未接种的对照组。在感染之前和之后连续7周收集血液样本和口咽拭子。使用SwinecheckAPP ELISA和Multi-APP ELISA(蒙特利尔大学)测试血清样品。接种后49天对所有猪实施安乐死。培养扁桃体和肺样品以进行分离,并通过PCR测试。 Multi-APP ELISA比Swinecheck?APP ELISA提前1周检测到血清转化,在感染后1周(血清素10)检测到最早的血清转化,在感染后3周(血清素1)检测到最新的血清转化。在第49天的血清转化是血清型依赖性的,从血清型10组中检测到的4个阳性(44%)到血清型15组中检测到的9个阳性(100%)不等。感染后49天,有31头猪的胸膜肺炎链球菌血清学呈阳性,根据PCR结果,仅15头的扁桃体上仍携带胸膜肺炎链球菌。使用Swinecheck?APP ELISA对血清样品进行交叉测试时,未观察到交叉反应。从两只猪胸膜肺炎的猪中成功分离出胸膜肺炎链球菌,但由于常驻菌群的严重污染,未从扁桃体中分离出胸膜肺炎单胞菌。这项研究对当前可用于检测胸膜肺炎亚临床感染的诊断工具进行了全面评估

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号