首页> 外文期刊>Vascular >Cryoplasty offers no advantage over standard balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent stenosis
【24h】

Cryoplasty offers no advantage over standard balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent stenosis

机译:冷冻成形术在治疗支架内狭窄方面没有优于标准球囊血管成形术的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In-stent restenosis is the primary failure mode of endovascular treatment of occlusive disease in the femeropopliteal segment. Cryoplasty has been proposed to reduce intimal hyperplasia through induction of apoptosis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of cryoplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis compared to conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA). After IRB approval, a retrospective record review was performed of reinterventions for in-stent restenosis by a single vascular surgery group at a university hospital. Reinterventions involving cryoplasty and CBA were evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention with duplex imaging to identify significant recurrent stenosis utilizing established velocity criteria. Data collected included basic demographic information and comorbidities as well as time to restenosis. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with the log rank test, Wilcoxon rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. From December 2004 to November 2007, 76 reinterventions were performed using CBA (n = 39) or cryoplasty (n = 37) for in-stent restenosis without placement of additional stents. Periprocedural technical success (>30% residual stenosis) was 100% for both groups, with no complications. The two cohorts were statistically similar in mean age, gender, comorbidities, tobacco use and use of statins, aspirin and Plavix. However, the mean lesion length was significantly longer in the cryoplasty cohort (CBA: 140.9 mm, Cyro: 191.7 mm; P = 0.032). The mean time to recurrent stenosis or need for additional secondary intervention was significantly shorter for the cyroplasty cohort than for the CBA, 4.09 and 10.79 months, respectively (P = .0001). Recurrent stenosis-free survival was significantly lower in the cyroplasty cohort at 3 months (CBA: 96.9%, Cyro: 88.9%) and 6 months (CBA: 84.0%, Cyro: 43.8%; P = .0089). Cyroplasty as a modality for treatment of in-stent stenosis in the femoropopliteal segment offers no benefit over CBA.
机译:支架内再狭窄是股pop段血管内治疗闭塞性疾病的主要失败方式。已经提出了冷冻成形术通过诱导凋亡来减少内膜增生。我们试图评估与常规球囊血管成形术(CBA)相比,冷冻成形术治疗支架内再狭窄的疗效。 IRB批准后,由一家大学医院的单个血管外科小组对支架内再狭窄的再干预进行了回顾性记录回顾。在采用双重成像干预后的1、3、6和12个月,对涉及冷冻成形术和CBA的再干预进行了评估,以利用既定的速度标准确定明显的复发性狭窄。收集的数据包括基本的人口统计学信息和合并症以及再狭窄的时间。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,对数秩检验,Wilcoxon秩检验和Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。从2004年12月至2007年11月,使用CBA(n = 39)或冷冻成形术(n = 37)对支架内再狭窄进行了76例再干预,而未放置其他支架。两组的围手术期技术成功率(> 30%残余狭窄)均为100%,无并发症。这两个队列在平均年龄,性别,合并症,烟草使用以及他汀类药物,阿司匹林和Plavix的使用上在统计学上相似。然而,在冷冻成形术队列中,平均病变长度明显更长(CBA:140.9 mm,Cyro:191.7 mm; P = 0.032)。椎管成形术组再狭窄的平均时间或需要额外的二次干预的时间明显少于CBA,分别为4.09和10.79个月(P = .0001)。术后第3个月(CBA:96.9%,Cyro:88.9%)和6个月(CBA:84.0%,Cyro:43.8%; P = .0089)在环成形术队列中的无狭窄复发复发率明显降低。椎体成形术是治疗股segment段支架内狭窄的一种方式,没有比CBA受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号