...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia >Agreement between direct, oscillometric and Doppler ultrasound blood pressures using three different cuff positions in anesthetized dogs.
【24h】

Agreement between direct, oscillometric and Doppler ultrasound blood pressures using three different cuff positions in anesthetized dogs.

机译:在麻醉狗中使用三个不同的袖带位置,直接,示波法和多普勒超声血压之间的一致性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the agreement between invasive blood pressure (IBP) and Doppler ultrasound blood pressure (DUBP) using three cuff positions and oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) in anesthetized dogs. Study design: Prospective study. Animals: Nine adult dogs weighing 14.5-29.5 kg. Methods: The cuff was placed above and below the tarsus, and above the carpus with the DUBP and above the carpus with the OBP monitor. Based on IBP recorded via a dorsal pedal artery catheter, conditions of low, normal, and high systolic arterial pressures [SAP (mmHg) <90, between 90 and 140, and >140, respectively] were induced by changes in isoflurane concentrations and/or dopamine administration. Mean biases +or-2 SD (limits of agreement) were determined. Results: At high blood pressures, regardless of cuff position, SAP determinations with the DUBP underestimated invasive SAP values by more than 20 mmHg in most instances. With the DUBP, cuff placement above the tarsus yielded better agreement with invasive SAP during low blood pressures (0.2+or-16 mmHg). The OBP underestimated SAP during high blood pressures (-42+or-42 mmHg) and yielded better agreement with IBP for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure measurements [overall bias: 2+or-15 mmHg (MAP) and 0.2+or-16 mmHg (DAP)]. Conclusions: Agreement of SAP determinations with the DUBP is poor at SAP >140 mmHg, regardless of cuff placement. Measurement error of the DUBP with the cuff placed above the tarsus is clinically acceptable during low blood pressures. Agreement of MAP and DAP measurements with this OBP monitor compared with IBP was clinically acceptable over a wide pressure range. Clinical relevance: With the DUBP device, placing the cuff above the tarsus allows reasonable agreement with IBP obtained via dorsal pedal artery catheterization. Only MAP and DAP provide reasonable estimates of direct blood pressure with the OBP monitor evaluated.
机译:目的:通过麻醉后的三个袖带位置和示波血压(OBP),评估侵入性血压(IBP)和多普勒超声血压(DUBP)之间的一致性。研究设计:前瞻性研究。动物:九只成年犬,体重14.5-29.5公斤。方法:将袖带放置在架的上方和下方,DUBP放置在腕骨上方,OBP监测器放置在腕骨上方。根据通过脚背动脉导管记录的IBP,异氟烷浓度和//的变化诱发了收缩压低,正常和高的情况[SAP(mmHg)<90,分别在90和140之间,以及> 140]。或多巴胺给药。确定平均偏差+或-2 SD(一致限)。结果:在高血压情况下,无论袖带位置如何,在大多数情况下,用DUBP进行SAP测定都低估了侵入性SAP值20 mmHg以上。使用DUBP时,在血压低(0.2+或16 mmHg)时,将套囊放置在above架上方可与侵入性SAP达成更好的一致性。 OBP在高血压(-42+或-42 mmHg)期间低估了SAP,并且与IBP的平均(MAP)和舒张压(DAP)动脉压测量结果比较一致[总体偏差:2+或-15 mmHg(MAP) 0.2+或16 mmHg(DAP)]。结论:SAP> 140 mmHg时,与DUBP进行SAP测定的一致性较差,无论是否放置袖带。在低血压期间,将袖带置于架上方时,DUBP的测量误差在临床上是可以接受的。在较宽的压力范围内,使用该OBP监护仪与IBP进行MAP和DAP测量的一致性在临床上是可以接受的。临床意义:使用DUBP装置,将袖带放置在above架上方可以与通过背侧踏板动脉导管插入术获得的IBP合理吻合。只有MAP和DAP可以通过评估OBP监视器来提供对直接血压的合理估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号