...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Distinct Shared Decision-Making Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
【24h】

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Distinct Shared Decision-Making Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population

机译:种族不同的患者群体中两种不同的髋关节和膝部骨关节炎共享决策帮助的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the use of decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) regarding the potential risks and benefits of different treatment options. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted of 147 patients with advanced hip or knee OA to compare the effect of two decision aids (booklet-only vs. booklet with DVD). Results: Both decision aid programs were well received and demonstrated improvements in patient knowledge and willingness to participate in treatment decisions. The decision aids, however, had a marginal effect on patient willingness to participate in OA management, with an increase of 0.11 and 0.6 on a scale of 2 (P = 0.58) between groups. Conclusions: The decision aids were accepted for most patients and effective in improving patient knowledge and willingness to participate in the decision process. Nevertheless, the addition of a more expensive DVD to the booklet program did not improve patient acceptance or knowledge.
机译:目的:评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎(OA)决策辅助工具的使用,以了解不同治疗方案的潜在风险和益处。方法:对147例晚期髋关节或膝关节OA患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机对照试验,以比较两种决策辅助工具(仅小册子与带有DVD的小册子)的效果。结果:两种决策辅助程序均受到好评,并显示出患者知识和参与治疗决策意愿的提高。但是,决策辅助对患者参与OA管理的意愿影响很小,两组之间的差异为2(P = 0.58),分别增加了0.11和0.6。结论:决策辅助工具已为大多数患者接受,并有效地提高了患者的知识和参与决策过程的意愿。但是,在小册子程序中添加更昂贵的DVD并不能提高患者的接受度或知识水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号