...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Television Campaign to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Television Campaign to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among the Elderly

机译:促进老年人季节性流感疫苗接种的电视运动的成本-效果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The U.S. policy goals regarding influenza vaccination coverage rate among the elderly include the increase in the coverage rate and the elimination of disparities across racial/ethnic groups. Objective: To examine the potential effectiveness of a television (TV) campaign to increase seasonal influenza vaccination among the elderly. Methods: We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, defined as incremental cost per additionally vaccinated Medicare individual) of a hypothetical nationwide TV campaign for influenza vaccination compared with no campaign. We measured the effectiveness of the nationwide TV campaign (advertised once a week at prime time for 30 seconds) during a 17-week influenza vaccination season among four racial/ethnic elderly groups (N=39 million): non Hispanic white (W), non-Hispanic African American (AA), English-speaking Hispanic (EH), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic (SH). Results: The hypothetical campaign cost was $5,960,000 (in 2012 US dollars). The estimated campaign effectiveness ranged from -1.1% (the SH group) to 1.42% (the W group), leading to an increased disparity in influenza vaccination among non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic African American (W-AA) groups (0.6 percentage points), W-EH groups (0.1 percentage points), and W-SH groups (1.5 percentage points). The estimated ICER was $23.54 (95% confidence interval $14.21-$39.37) per additionally vaccinated Medicare elderly in a probabilistic analysis. Race/ethnicity-specific ICERs were lowest among the EH group ($22.27), followed by the W group ($22.47) and the AA group ($30.55). The nationwide TV campaign was concluded to be reasonably cost-effective compared with a benchmark intervention (with ICER $44.39 per vaccinated individual) of a school-located vaccination program. Break-even analyses estimated the maximum acceptable campaign cost to be $14,870,000, which was comparable to the benchmark ICER. Conclusions: The results could justify public expenditures on the implementation of a future nationwide TV campaign, which should include multilingual campaigns, for promoting seasonal influenza vaccination. 2015 (C) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).
机译:背景:关于老年人中流感疫苗接种率的美国政策目标包括提高覆盖率和消除种族/族裔群体之间的差异。目的:研究电视活动提高老年人季节性流感疫苗接种的潜在效力。方法:我们估算了假设的全国电视流感疫苗接种活动与没有疫苗接种活动相比的增量成本效益比(ICER,定义为每位额外接种Medicare的个人的增量成本)。我们在17个星期的流感疫苗接种季节中,对四个种族/族裔老年人群体(N = 3900万)进行了全国性电视宣传活动(在黄金时段每周一次,播发30秒)的效果:非西班牙裔白人(W),非西班牙裔美国人(AA),讲英语的西班牙裔(EH)和讲西班牙语的西班牙裔(SH)。结果:假设的竞选费用为596万美元(以2012年美元计)。估计的运动效果介于-1.1%(SH组)至1.42%(W组)之间,导致非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔非洲裔美国人(W-AA)组之间的流感疫苗接种差距越来越大(0.6个百分点),W-EH组(0.1个百分点)和W-SH组(1.5个百分点)。在概率分析中,估计的每个额外接种Medicare老人的ICER为23.54美元(95%置信区间为14.21-39.37美元)。种族/族裔特定的ICER在EH组中最低($ 22.27),其次是W组($ 22.47)和AA组($ 30.55)。与在学校进行的疫苗接种计划的基准干预措施(每名接受疫苗接种者ICER $ 44.39的基准干预)相比,全国电视宣传活动的成本效益合理。收支平衡分析估计,可接受的最高竞选成本为14,870,000美元,与基准ICER相当。结论:结果可以证明公共开支用于实施未来的全国电视运动,其中应包括多语言运动,以促进季节性流感疫苗接种。 2015(C)由Elsevier Inc.代表国际药物经济学和结果研究学会(ISPOR)出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号