首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Costo Efectividad de Posaconazol versus Fluconazol/Itraconazol en el Tratamiento Profilactico de las Infecciones Fungicas Invasivas en Mexico
【24h】

Costo Efectividad de Posaconazol versus Fluconazol/Itraconazol en el Tratamiento Profilactico de las Infecciones Fungicas Invasivas en Mexico

机译:泊沙康唑与氟康唑/伊曲康唑在墨西哥侵袭性真菌感染的预防性治疗中的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cost effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole therapy in the prophylaxis against invasive fungal Infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Mexico. Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness and long-term combined effects of Posaconazole versus fluconazole/itraconazole (standard azole) therapy in the prophylaxis against invasive fungal Infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Mexico. Methods: A previously validated Markov model was used to compare the projected lifetime costs and effects of two theoretical groups of patients, one receiving Posaconazole and the other receiving standard azole. The model estimates total costs, numbers of IFIs, and QALY per patient in each prophylaxis group. To extrapolate trial results to a lifetime horizon, the model was extended with one-month Markov cycles in which mortality risk is specific to the underlying disease. Data on the probabilities of IFI were obtained from Study Protocol PO1899. Drug costs were taken from average wholesale drug reports for 2009. Cost and health effects were discounted at 5% according to the Mexican guideline. The analysis was conducted from the Mexican healthcare perspectiveusing 2008 unit cost prices. Results: Our model projects an accumulated cost to the Mexican healthcare system per patient receiving the Posaconazol regimen of $US 5,634 compared to $US 7,463 for the standard azole regimen. The accumulated discounted effect is 3.13 LY or 2.25 QALYs per patient receiving Posaconazol, compared to 2.96 LY or 2.13 QALYs per patient receiving standard azole. Posaconazol. remained the dominant strategy across each scenario. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. Conclusion: Posaconazole provides modest incremental benefits compared with standard azole therapy in the prophylaxis against IFIs among high-risk neutropenic patients. Routine Posaconazole use appears a cost saving when the likelihood of IFIs or the cost of treatment medications is high. Palabras Claues. costo/efectividad, fluconazol, itraconazol, infecciones fungicas, posaconazol.
机译:泊沙康唑与氟康唑/伊曲康唑疗法在墨西哥高危中性粒细胞减少症患者中预防侵袭性真菌感染的成本效益。目的:评估泊沙康唑与氟康唑/伊曲康唑(标准唑)疗法在墨西哥高危中性粒细胞减少症患者中预防侵入性真菌感染的成本效益和长期综合效果。方法:使用先前验证的马尔可夫模型比较两组理论患者的预期终生费用和疗效,一组接受泊沙康唑,另一组接受标准唑。该模型估计每个预防组中每个患者的总成本,IFI数量和QALY。为了将试验结果推算至生命周期,该模型扩展了一个月的马尔可夫周期,其中死亡风险特定于潜在疾病。从研究方案PO1899中获得有关IFI概率的数据。药品成本取自2009年的平均批发药品报告。根据墨西哥指南,成本和健康影响折现为5%。该分析是从墨西哥医疗保健角度使用2008年单位成本价格进行的。结果:我们的模型预测,接受Posaconazol方案的墨西哥患者每位患者的医疗保健系统累积费用为5,634美元,而标准唑方案为7,463美元。每位接受泊沙康唑的患者的累积折现效应为3.13 LY或2.25 QALYs,而每位接受标准唑的患者为2.96 LY或2.13 QALYs。泊沙康唑。仍然是每种情况下的主要策略。概率敏感性分析测试了有关模型成本和功效参数的众多假设,并发现结果对大多数更改都具有鲁棒性。结论:与标准唑治疗相比,泊沙康唑在高危中性粒细胞减少症患者中预防IFI方面具有适度的增量获益。当IFI的可能性或治疗药物的成本很高时,常规使用泊沙康唑似乎可以节省成本。 Palabras Claues。 Costo / Efectividad,氟康唑,伊曲康唑,杀真菌剂,泊沙康唑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号