...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-utility of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation
【24h】

Cost-utility of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation

机译:腹腔镜尼森胃底折叠术与质子泵抑制剂治疗慢性和控制性胃食管反流病的成本-效用:3年前瞻性随机对照试验和经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Very few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) medical management for patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Larger RCTs have been relatively short in duration, and have reported mixed results regarding symptom control and effect on quality of life (QOL). Economic evaluations have reported conflicting results. Objectives: To determine the incremental cost-utility of LNF versus PPI for treating patients with chronic and controlled GERD over 3 years from the societal perspective. Methods: Economic evaluation was conducted alongside a RCT that enrolled 104 patients from October 2000 to September 2004. Primary study outcome was GERD symptoms (secondary outcomes included QOL and cost-utility). Resource utilization and QOL data collected at regular follow-up intervals determined incremental cost/QALY gained. Stochastic uncertainty was assessed using bootstrapping and methodologic assumptions were assessed using sensitivity analysis. Results: No statistically significant differences in GERD symptom scores, but LNF did result in fewer heartburn days and improved QOL. Costs were higher for LNF patients by $3205/ patient over 3 years but QOL was also higher as measured by either QOL instrument. Based on total costs, incremental cost-utility of LNF was $29,404/QALY gained using the Health Utility Index 3. Cost-utility results were sensitive to the utility instrument used ($29,404/QALY for Health Utility Index 3, $31,117/QALY for the Short Form 6D, and $76,310/QALY for EuroQol 5D) and if current lower prices for PPIs were used in the analysis. Conclusions: Results varied depending on resource use/costs included in the analysis, the QOL instrument used, and the cost of PPIs; however, LNF was generally found to be a cost-effective treatment for patients with symptomatic controlled GERD requiring longterm management.
机译:背景:极少有随机对照试验(RCT)将腹腔镜尼森胃底折叠术(LNF)与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)药物治疗对慢性胃食管反流病(GERD)的患者进行比较。较大的RCT持续时间相对较短,并且报告了有关症状控制和对生活质量(QOL)的影响的混合结果。经济评估报告了相互矛盾的结果。目的:从社会的角度确定LNF与PPI在3年内治疗慢性和受控GERD患者的增量成本效用。方法:与2000年10月至2004年9月的104例RCT一起进行了经济评估。主要研究结果为GERD症状(次要结果包括QOL和成本-效用)。定期跟踪间隔收集的资源利用率和QOL数据确定了获得的增量成本/ QALY。随机不确定性使用自举法进行评估,方法学假设使用敏感性分析进行评估。结果:GERD症状评分无统计学差异,但LNF确实减少了烧心天数并改善了QOL。 LNF患者的费用在3年内增加了$ 3205 /患者,但使用任一QOL仪器衡量的QOL也较高。根据总成本,使用“健康公用事业指数3”获得的LNF增量成本-效用为$ 29,404 / QALY,成本效用结果对所使用的实用工具敏感(“健康公用事业指数3”为$ 29,404 / QALY,短期服务为$ 31,117 / QALY)。如果在分析中使用了当前较低的PPI价格,则可以使用表格6D和EuroQol 5D的$ 76,310 / QALY。结论:结果因分析中包括的资源使用/成本,所使用的QOL工具和PPI的成本而异;然而,对于需要长期治疗的对症控制GERD患者,LNF通常被认为是一种经济有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号