首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.
【24h】

A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.

机译:他克莫司和西罗莫司与他克莫司和霉酚酸酯对环孢素(NEORAL)和西罗莫司在肾移植中的随机长期试验。一,一年的药物相互作用和排斥反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: To reduce long-term nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitor dosage, adjunctive sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was used in a 150-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor first renal transplant recipients (n=50/group). METHODS: Group A received tacrolimus and sirolimus. Target tacrolimus trough levels postoperatively were 10, 8, and 6 ng/mL at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Group B received tacrolimus and MMF. Target tacrolimus trough levels were 10 and 8 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year, with a targeted dose of MMF of 1 g twice daily. Group C received cyclosporine A (CsA) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and sirolimus with target CsA trough levels of 225 and 175 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year. Maintenance sirolimus target trough levels were 8 ng/mL in groups A and C. Each group received daclizumab induction and methylprednisolone maintenance. This first of two companion 1-year reports details demographics, drug-dosing interactions, and rejection. RESULTS: There were no notable differences in group demographics, but a somewhat less favorable course occurred in group C, despite higher bioavailability of sirolimus in group C versus group A (P<0.001). Acute rejection rates were lower in groups A (4%) and B (4%) combined versus group C (14%) (P=0.03). Histopathologic findings were supported by comparing perioperative with 1-year postoperative protocol biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year interim analysis indicates that a decreasing dosage of tacrolimus with either adjunctive sirolimus or MMF may optimize future graft survival versus a less favorable outcome using a similar algorithm with CsA and sirolimus.
机译:背景:为减少长期肾毒性钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的使用,在尸体或人类白细胞抗原异体活体供体第一个肾移植受者的150名患者,随机,三臂试验中使用了辅助性西罗莫司或霉酚酸酯(MMF) (n = 50 /组)。方法:A组接受他克莫司和西罗莫司治疗。术后1个月,6个月和1年的他克莫司低谷目标水平分别为10、8和6 ng / mL。 B组接受他克莫司和MMF治疗。他克莫司的最低谷水平在1个月和1年分别为10和8 ng / mL,MMF的目标剂量为每天两次,每次1 g。 C组在1个月和1年接受环孢素A(CsA)(Neoral,Novartis,Basel,瑞士)和西罗莫司的目标CsA谷水平分别为225和175 ng / mL。 A组和C组的维持西罗莫司目标谷水平为8 ng / mL。每组均接受达珠单抗诱导和甲基强的松龙维持。这是两个伴随的1年期报告中的第一个,详细介绍了人口统计学,给药相互作用和排斥反应。结果:尽管C组的西罗莫司的生物利用度高于A组,但C组的人口统计学没有显着差异,但C组的病程较差(P <0.001)。 A组(4%)和B组(4%)的急性排斥率低于C组(14%)(P = 0.03)。通过比较围手术期和术后1年的活检,可以支持组织病理学检查。结论:这项为期1年的中期分析表明,他克莫司与西罗莫司辅助剂或MMF的剂量减少可能优化了未来的移植物存活,而使用CsA和西罗莫司的类似算法则不利于预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号