...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Effects of prophylactic splenic artery modulation on portal overperfusion and liver regeneration in small-for-size graft.
【24h】

Effects of prophylactic splenic artery modulation on portal overperfusion and liver regeneration in small-for-size graft.

机译:预防性脾动脉调制对小号移植物门脉过度灌注和肝脏再生的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The small-for-size (SFS) syndrome is caused by excessive portal inflow into a small-sized liver graft. Various approaches for portal decompression have been used, but details of their impact on liver regeneration in SFS graft remain unclear. We examined the effect of prophylactic splenic artery modulation (SAM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. The study group was 39 consecutive adult-to-adult living liver transplantation recipients, with a graft-to-recipient body weight ratio of less than 0.8. Patients were assigned into the non-SAM group (n=18, without any portal inflow attenuation) or SAM group (n=21, preoperative embolization in 15 patients and intraoperative ligation in 6 patients). Hepatic hemodynamics, graft function, liver regeneration, and outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: In the SAM group, the excessive portal flow was significantly reduced (P<0.01) and the effect of embolization on portal decompression was equivalent to that of ligation. In the acute postoperative phase, serum transaminases, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, were lower in the SAM group than in non-SAM group. In both groups, a negative correlation was observed between graft-to-recipient body weight ratio and liver regeneration rate at 2 weeks after living donor liver transplantation. Splenic artery modulation was advantageous for liver regeneration, and significantly improved clinical features, hyperbilirubinemia, and prolonged ascites. Small-for-size syndrome occurred in five patients of the non-SAM group, and only one of SAM group (P=0.038). CONCLUSION: In SFS graft with severe portal hypertension, prophylactic splenic embolization/ligation seems to relieve portal overperfusion injury and contributes in improvement of posttransplantation prognosis through liver regeneration.
机译:背景:小型(SFS)综合征是由于过多的门静脉流入小型肝移植物中引起的。门静脉减压的各种方法已被使用,但是它们对SFS移植肝再生的影响的细节仍不清楚。我们检查了预防性脾动脉调节(SAM)的作用。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。该研究组是连续39位成人到成人的活体肝移植接受者,移植物与受者的体重比小于0.8。将患者分为非SAM组(n = 18,无任何门静脉入流减弱)或SAM组(n = 21,术前栓塞15例,术中结扎6例)。评估肝的血液动力学,移植物功能,肝再生和结局。结果:在SAM组中,过大的门脉血流明显减少(P <0.01),栓塞对门脉减压的作用与结扎相当。在急性术后阶段,SAM组的血清转氨酶,白介素6和肿瘤坏死因子-α低于非SAM组。在两组中,在活体供体肝移植后2周时,移植物与受者的体重比与肝脏再生率之间均呈负相关。脾动脉调节有利于肝​​脏再生,并显着改善临床特征,高胆红素血症和长时间腹水。非SAM组中有5例患者发生了小尺寸综合征,而SAM组中只有1例发生(P = 0.038)。结论:在严重门静脉高压症的SFS移植物中,预防性脾脏栓塞/结扎似乎可以减轻门静脉过度灌注损伤,并有助于通过肝再生改善移植后的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号