...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.
【24h】

Preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

机译:预防巨细胞病毒毒血症的预防性治疗,以预防实体器官移植接受者中的巨细胞病毒疾病。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. METHODS: The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). CONCLUSIONS: Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.
机译:背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)是固体器官移植受者发病和死亡的重要原因。对于CMV病毒血症患者,采用抗病毒药先发制人的治疗已广泛用作预防CMV疾病的常规预防方法。进行这项研究以评估先发制人疗法在预防症状性CMV疾病中的功效。方法:对Cochrane CENTRAL注册中心,MEDLINE,EMBASE和参考列表进行搜索,以对实体器官移植受者进行的先发性治疗的随机试验。两位作者提取了所有数据。使用随机效应模型进行分析,结果表示为相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:确定了十项合格试验(476例患者),其中六项为先发性治疗与安慰剂或标准护理(疾病发生时进行CMV的治疗),三项先发性治疗与抗病毒药物的预防以及一项口服或静脉内先发性治疗。与安慰剂或标准护理相比,先发制人的治疗显着降低了CMV疾病的风险(6个试验,288名患者,RR 0.29,95%CI 0.11至0.80),但没有急性排斥反应(3个试验,185例患者,RR 1.06,95%CI) (0.64至1.76)或全因死亡率(2个试验,176例患者,RR 1.23,95%CI 0.35至4.30)。抢先治疗与预防的比较试验显示,CMV疾病的风险(2个试验,151名患者,RR 0.42,95%CI 0.07至2.65),急性排斥反应(1个试验,70个患者,RR 0.94,95%CI)无显着差异(0.42至2.09)或全因死亡率(3个试验,151例患者,RR 1.86,95%CI 0.61至5.72)。结论:很少有随机试验评估先发疗法预防CMV疾病的效果。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,抢先疗法是有效的,但是还需要进行更多的头对头试验,以确定抢先疗法的相对利弊,并进行预防以预防实体器官移植接受者的CMV疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号