...
首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Medicine and International Health: TM and IH >Inconclusive results in conventional serological screening for Chagas' disease in blood banks: evaluation of cellular and humoral response.
【24h】

Inconclusive results in conventional serological screening for Chagas' disease in blood banks: evaluation of cellular and humoral response.

机译:常规血清学检查血库中查加斯病的结果尚无定论:细胞和体液反应的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To find the most reliable screening method for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in blood banks. Material and methods Epidemiological data, lymphoproliferation assay, parasitological, conventional serological tests: immunofluorescence, haemagglutination, ELISA with epimastigote and trypomastigote antigens and reference serological tests: trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigens (TESA) blot and chemiluminescent ELISA assay with mucine from trypomastigote forms were applied to individuals with inconclusive serology, non-chagasic individuals and chronic chagasic patients. Results TESA blot had the best performance when used as a single test in all the groups. In the inconclusive group 20.5% of individuals were positive for TESA blot, 23.3% for either lymphoproliferation or TESA blot, and 17.8% for lymphoproliferation only. Positive lymphoproliferation without detectable antibodies was observed in 5.47% of all inconclusive serology cases. Analysis of six parameters (three serological assays, at least one parasitological test, one lymphoproliferation assay and epidemiological data) in the inconclusive group showed that diagnosis of Chagas' disease was probable in 15 patients who were positive by two or more serological tests or for whom three of those six parameters were positive. Conclusion TESA blot is a good confirmatory test for Chagas' disease in the inconclusive group. Although lymphoproliferation suggests the diagnosis of Chagas' disease in the absence of antibodies when associated with a high epidemiological risk of acquiring Chagas' disease, the data from this study and the characteristics of the lymphoproliferation assay (which is both laborious and time-consuming) do not support its use as a confirmatory test in blood-bank screening. However, our findings underscore the need to develop alternative methods that are not based on antibody detection to improve the diagnosis when serological tests are inconclusive.
机译:目的寻找最可靠的血库克氏锥虫感染筛查方法。材料和方法流行病学数据,淋巴增生测定,寄生虫学,常规血清学检测:免疫荧光,血凝,表观鞭毛虫和锥虫病抗原的ELISA和参考血清学试验:使用锥虫病的分泌蛋白分泌的锥虫病和锥虫粪便的分泌和化学发光ELISA法适用于血清学尚无定论的个人,非chachaic个体和慢性chagasic患者。结果当在所有组中用作单个测试时,TESA印迹均具有最佳性能。在非决定性组中,仅20.5%的个体的TESA印迹阳性,23.3%的淋巴增殖或TESA印迹阳性,仅17.8%的淋巴增殖阳性。在所有不确定性血清学病例中,有5.47%观察到阳性淋巴细胞增殖而未检测到抗体。在非结论性组中对六个参数(三个血清学检测,至少一项寄生虫学检测,一项淋巴增殖检测和流行病学数据)的分析表明,经两次或更多次血清学检测呈阳性或对其进行筛查的15例患者有可能诊断出恰加斯病这六个参数中的三个为正。结论TESA印迹法在不确定的人群中对查加斯病具有很好的验证性。尽管淋巴增生提示在缺乏抗体的情况下诊断出恰加斯病,但与获得恰加斯病的高流行病学风险相关,但这项研究的数据和淋巴增殖测定的特点(既费力又费时)不支持将其用作血库筛查中的验证性测试。但是,我们的发现强调需要开发不基于抗体检测的替代方法,以在血清学试验尚无定论时改善诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号