首页> 外文期刊>Xenotransplantation >People's attitude toward xenotransplantation: affective reactions and the influence of the evaluation context.
【24h】

People's attitude toward xenotransplantation: affective reactions and the influence of the evaluation context.

机译:人们对异种移植的态度:情感反应和评估环境的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: One of the major issues in transplantation is to find a strategy to overcome the scarcity of human organs. One of the interventions under investigation is represented by xenotransplantation. The present study aimed to understand the role of psychological factors on people's perception of xenotransplantation. In particular, we tested a condition in which different alternatives (e.g., human vs. pig donors) are presented together allowing people to compare among them (joint evaluation) and two conditions in which people are presented with only one of the two alternatives and cannot compare them (separate evaluation). METHODS: The study was conducted with three different groups of participants: patients waiting for liver transplantation (N = 31 in joint evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions); students (N = 30 in join evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions); and healthy adults (N = 30 in joint evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions). Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios and asked how good (or bad) were their feelings toward one or two types of donor (e.g., human and pig). RESULTS: Patients showed a skeptical attitude toward xenotransplantation both when it was evaluated together with the human donor (P < 0.01) or when it was evaluated separately (P < 0.01). Differently, when asked to evaluate each donor separately healthy adults and students showed similar affective reactions toward the two alternatives (human organ and xenograft). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the evaluation context may increase the impact of affective reactions and reduce healthy people's ability to use information on the potential benefit of a novel biomedical technology. Regardless of the evaluation context, patients always rely on affective reactions and show an overall preference for the human organ.
机译:背景:移植中的主要问题之一是找到一种克服人体器官短缺的策略。被调查的干预措施之一是异种移植。本研究旨在了解心理因素在人们对异种移植的感知中的作用。特别是,我们测试了一个条件,在该条件下,将不同的替代方案(例如,人与猪的供体)一起展示,使人们可以在其中进行比较(联合评估);在两个条件下,人们仅展示了两个替代方案中的一个,并且不能比较它们(单独评估)。方法:本研究是在三组不同的参与者中进行的:等待肝移植的患者(联合评估为N = 31,两种独立评估条件分别为N = 30);学生(参加联合评估的人数为N = 30,在两个单独的评估条件中的每个人数均为N = 30);和健康成人(联合评估中的N = 30,两个单独评估条件中的每个条件N = 30)。向参与者介绍了假设情景,并询问他们对一种或两种类型的捐赠者(例如人和猪)的感觉有多好(或不好)。结果:当与人类供体一起评估时(P <0.01)或单独评估时(P <0.01),患者对异种移植均表现出怀疑态度。不同的是,当要求分别评估每个捐赠者时,健康的成年人和学生对两种选择(人体器官和异种移植物)表现出相似的情感反应。结论:本研究表明,评估环境可能会增加情感反应的影响,并降低健康人使用信息的能力,从而获得有关新型生物医学技术的潜在好处。无论评估的背景如何,患者始终依靠情感反应,并表现出对人体器官的总体偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号