首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Effectiveness of multidimensional cancer survivor rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation in general: A systematic review
【24h】

Effectiveness of multidimensional cancer survivor rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation in general: A systematic review

机译:多维癌症幸存者康复的有效性和癌症康复的总体成本效益:系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction. Many cancer survivors suffer from a combination of disease- and treatment-related morbidities and complaints after primary treatment. There is a growing evidence base for the effectiveness of monodimensional rehabilitation interventions; in practice, however, patients often participate in multidimensional programs. This study systematically reviews evidence regarding effectiveness of multidimensional rehabilitation programs for cancer survivors and cost-effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation in general. Methods. The published literature was systematically reviewed. Data were extracted using standardized forms and were summarized narratively. Results. Sixteen effectiveness and six cost-effectiveness studies were included. Multidimensional rehabilitation programs were found to be effective, but not more effective than monodimensional interventions, and not on all outcome measures. Effect sizes for quality of life were in the range of -0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.45-0.20) to 0.98 (95% CI, 0.69-1.29). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from -?16,976, indicating cost savings, to ?11,057 per quality-adjusted life year. Conclusions. The evidence for multidimensional interventions and the economic impact of rehabilitation studies is scarce and dominated by breast cancer studies. Studies published so far report statistically significant benefits for multidimensional interventions over usual care, most notably for the outcomes fatigue and physical functioning. An additional benefit of multidimensional over monodimensional rehabilitation was not found, but this was also sparsely reported on. Available economic evaluations assessed very different rehabilitation interventions. Yet, despite low comparability, all showed favorable cost-effectiveness ratios. Future studies should focus their designs on the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multidimensional programs.
机译:介绍。许多癌症幸存者在初次治疗后遭受与疾病和治疗相关的疾病以及主诉的综合困扰。一维康复干预措施有效性的证据基础不断增加;然而,实际上,患者经常参加多维计划。这项研究系统地回顾了有关针对癌症幸存者的多维康复计划的有效性以及总体而言癌症康复的成本效益的证据。方法。系统评价了已发表的文献。使用标准化形式提取数据并进行叙述性总结。结果。包括16项有效性和6项成本效益研究。多维康复计划被认为是有效的,但并不比一维干预措施有效,并且并非对所有结果指标都有效。生活质量的影响大小在-0.12(95%置信区间[CI],-0.45-0.20)至0.98(95%CI,0.69-1.29)之间。成本效益比的增加范围为-16,976欧元(表明节省了成本),至每个质量调整生命年的1,1,057欧元。结论。多维研究和康复研究的经济影响的证据很少,并且以乳腺癌研究为主导。迄今为止发表的研究报告显示,与常规护理相比,多维干预具有统计学上的显着优势,尤其是对于疲劳和身体机能的结局。没有发现多维康复优于一维康复,但是也很少有报道。现有的经济评估评估了非常不同的康复干预措施。然而,尽管可比性很低,但它们都显示出良好的成本效益比。未来的研究应将其设计重点放在多维计划的相对有效性和成本效益上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号