...
首页> 外文期刊>Tumour biology : >Mucins CA 125, CA 19.9, CA 15.3 and TAG-72.3 as tumor markers in patients with lung cancer: comparison with CYFRA 21-1, CEA, SCC and NSE.
【24h】

Mucins CA 125, CA 19.9, CA 15.3 and TAG-72.3 as tumor markers in patients with lung cancer: comparison with CYFRA 21-1, CEA, SCC and NSE.

机译:粘蛋白CA 125,CA 19.9,CA 15.3和TAG-72.3作为肺癌患者的肿瘤标志物:与CYFRA 21-1,CEA,SCC和NSE的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Tumor marker serum levels were prospectively studied in 289 patients with suspected, but unconfirmed, lung cancer and in 513 patients with lung cancer [417 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 96 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients]. In patients with benign disease, abnormal serum levels were found for the following tumor markers: CEA (in 6.6% of patients); CA 19.9 (6.2%); CA 125 (28.7%); NSE (0.7%); CYFRA (8.7%); TAG-72.3 (4.2%); SCC (3.5%), and CA 15.3 (3.5%). Excluding patients with renal failure or liver diseases, tumor marker specificity improved with abnormal levels in 0.5% for NSE, 0.9% for SCC, 2.8% for CEA, CA 15.3 and TAG-72.3, 3.8% for CA 19.9, 4.2% for CYFRA and 21.4% for CA 125. Excluding CA 125, one of the markers was abnormal in 15% of patients without malignancy. Tumor marker sensitivity was related to cancer histology and tumor extension. NSE had the highest sensitivity in SCLC and CYFRA and CEA in NSCLC. Significantly higher concentrations of CEA, SCC, CA 125, CA 15.3 and TAG-72.3 were found in NSCLC than in SCLC. Likewise, significantly higher CEA (p < 0.0001), TAG-72.3 (p < 0.001), CA 15.3 (p < 0.0001) and CA 125 (p < 0.01) were found in adenocarcinomas than in squamous tumors. Using a combination of 3 tumor markers (CEA, CYFRA 21-1 in all histologies, SCC in squamous tumors and CA 15.3 in adenocarcinomas), a high sensitivity may be achieved in all histological types. Tumor markers may be useful in the histological differentiation of NSCLC and SCLC. Using specific criteria for the differentiation of SCLC and NSCLC, the sensitivity was 84.2 and 68.8%, the specificity was 93.8 and 99.7%, the positive predictive value was 98.3 and 98.5% and the negative predictive value was 57.7 and 93.3%, respectively.
机译:前瞻性研究了289例疑似但未经证实的肺癌患者和513例肺癌患者的肿瘤标志物血清水平[417例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者和96例小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者]。在良性疾病患者中,发现以下肿瘤标志物的血清水平异常:CEA(占患者的6.6%); CA 19.9(6.2%); CA 125(28.7%); NSE(0.7%); CYFRA(8.7%); TAG-72.3(4.2%); SCC(3.5%)和CA 15.3(3.5%)。除肾功能衰竭或肝病患者外,肿瘤标志物特异性有所改善,NSE异常水平为0.5%,SCC为0.9%,CEA,CA 15.3和TAG-72.3为2.8%,CA 19.9为3.8%,CYFRA和4.2%。 CA 125为21.4%。不包括CA 125,在15%没有恶性肿瘤的患者中,其中一项标志物异常。肿瘤标记物敏感性与癌症组织学和肿瘤扩展有关。 NSE在NSCLC中对SCLC和CYFRA和CEA的敏感性最高。在NSCLC中发现的CEA,SCC,CA 125,CA 15.3和TAG-72.3的浓度明显高于SCLC。同样,在腺癌中发现的CEA(p <0.0001),TAG-72.3(p <0.001),CA 15.3(p <0.0001)和CA 125(p <0.01)明显高于鳞状癌。结合使用三种肿瘤标志物(所有组织学中的CEA,CYFRA 21-1,鳞状肿瘤中的SCC和腺癌中的CA 15.3),可以在所有组织学类型中实现高敏感性。肿瘤标志物可能在NSCLC和SCLC的组织学分化中有用。使用SCLC和NSCLC分化的特定标准,敏感性分别为84.2和68.8%,特异性分别为93.8和99.7%,阳性预测值为98.3和98.5%,阴性预测值为57.7和93.3%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号