首页> 外文期刊>X-Ray Spectrometry: An International Journal >Multielement analysis of lichen samples using XRF methods. Comparison with ICP-AES and FAAS
【24h】

Multielement analysis of lichen samples using XRF methods. Comparison with ICP-AES and FAAS

机译:使用XRF方法对地衣样品进行多元素分析。与ICP-AES和FAAS的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research presents the contents of Ca, Fe, Zn, Br, Rb, Sr and Pb in lichen samples used as biomonitors of air pollution collected in Havana. Statistical comparisons were made among the results obtained in three campaigns during three years. Two X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) methods were used, employing for excitation an annular Cd-109 source and a Mo X-ray tube with a molybdenum secondary target. In both cases, matrix effects were corrected by the use of normalization for the Compton scattered peak; in this way the determination is more efficient. For quality control of the results, biological Certified Reference Materials were analyzed and were made comparisons between XRF, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry and Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. No significant differences were found between the different techniques. The elemental distribution patterns obtained for each metal were associated with different pollution sources, thus contributing to the assessment of air pollution in Havana. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:本研究介绍了在哈瓦那收集的用作空气污染生物监测器的地衣样品中Ca,Fe,Zn,Br,Rb,Sr和Pb的含量。在三年中的三个运动中获得的结果之间进行了统计比较。使用了两种X射线荧光(XRF)方法,用于激发环形Cd-109源和带有钼次级靶的Mo X射线管。在两种情况下,通过对康普顿散射峰进行归一化来校正基质效应。这样,确定更加有效。为了对结果进行质量控制,对经过生物认证的参考材料进行了分析,并进行了XRF,电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法和火焰原子吸收光谱法之间的比较。在不同技术之间未发现显着差异。为每种金属获得的元素分布模式与不同的污染源相关,因此有助于评估哈瓦那的空气污染。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号