...
首页> 外文期刊>Tumori. >Statistical interaction in the survival analysis of early breast cancer using registry data: role of breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy.
【24h】

Statistical interaction in the survival analysis of early breast cancer using registry data: role of breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy.

机译:使用注册表数据在早期乳腺癌生存分析中的统计交互作用:保乳手术和放疗的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To identify subgroup effects that might influence the survival results of postoperative radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, aged 40-69 years, with non-metastasized T1-T2 breast carcinoma, in whom axillary lymph node dissection was performed. Subgroup analyses were performed using proportional hazards models with interactions. Joint significance of subgroups was evaluated with the Wald test. Event was death from any cause. RESULTS: Statistically significant interactions were found between type of surgery (breast-conserving [BCS] or mastectomy [ME]), radiotherapy [RT], T stage, and extent of nodal involvement, but not between treatments and nodal examination. For each treatment combination, ME-no RT, ME+RT, BCS-no RT, BCS+RT, the mortality hazard ratios were respectively: 1, 1.12, 1.11, 0.78 in T1, 0-3 positive nodes; 2.45, 2.77, 2.71, 1.92 in T2, 4+ nodes; 1.31, 1.38, 1.33, 1.19 in T2, 0-3+ nodes; and 3.41, 2.79, 3.44, 2.40 in T2, 4+ nodes. The corresponding joint tests showed: in the absence of radiotherapy, no significant survival disadvantage for breast-conserving surgery vs mastectomy; with radiotherapy, significant survival advantage for breast-conserving surgery irrespective of stage and for mastectomy in T2, 4+ nodes. For mastectomy in less advanced stages receiving radiotherapy, excess breast cancer deaths suggested undocumented adverse selection. The corresponding result was considered inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses found subgroup effects that should be taken into account to interpret treatment results in breast cancer.
机译:目的:确定可能影响术后放疗生存结果的亚组效应。病人和方法:从监测,流行病学和最终结果数据库中选出的妇女,年龄在40-69岁之间,患有非转移性T1-T2乳腺癌,其中行腋窝淋巴结清扫术。使用具有相互作用的比例风险模型进行亚组分析。用Wald检验评估亚组的联合显着性。事件是由于任何原因导致的死亡。结果:在手术类型(保乳术[BCS]或乳房切除术[ME]),放疗[RT],T分期和淋巴结受累程度之间发现了统计学上显着的相互作用,但在治疗和淋巴结检查之间没有发现相互作用。对于每种治疗组合,ME-no RT,ME + RT,BCS-no RT,BCS + RT,其死亡率危险比分别为:T1、0-3阳性淋巴结分别为1、1.12、1.11、0.78; T2、4个以上节点中的2.45、2.77、2.71、1.92; T2、0-3 +节点中的1.31、1.38、1.33、1.19;以及T2、4个以上节点中的3.41、2.79、3.44、2.40。相应的联合检查显示:在没有放疗的情况下,保乳手术与乳房切除术相比没有显着的生存不利;放疗对保乳手术具有显着的生存优势,无论分期如何以及在T2、4 +结节中进行乳房切除术都是如此。对于晚期接受放疗的乳房切除术,乳腺癌死亡人数过多,提示未选择不良的选择。相应的结果被认为是不确定的。结论:分析发现在解释乳腺癌的治疗结果时应考虑亚组效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号