首页> 外文期刊>Total Quality Management & Business Excellence >A framework for analysing higher education performance: students' satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions
【24h】

A framework for analysing higher education performance: students' satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions

机译:分析高等教育表现的框架:学生的满意度,感知的学习成果和辍学意图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Drawing on Tinto's [1975. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125] dropout-intentions model, Bean's [1985. Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 35-64] socialisation model, Astin's [1999. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529] involvement theory, and the service marketing literature, this research presents a conceptual framework for analysing students' satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. This framework allows for a better understanding of how students assess the university experience and how these perceptions affect future intentions. This article presents four studies testing fragments of the framework using data sets from three countries and various undergraduate programmes (business, economics, geography, and nursing). The models are tested using structural equation modelling with data collected using a questionnaire adapted to the specific contexts. The models have the ability to explain the studies' dependent variables and offer practical utility for decision-making. Applicability of the conceptual framework is evaluated in various contexts and with different student populations. One important finding is that student co-creation can be as important as perceived service quality in explaining students' cognitive learning outcomes, which in turn explain a high percentage of satisfaction and affective learning outcomes. The studies also shed light on the roles of variables such as emotional exhaustion and dropout intentions.
机译:借鉴Tinto的[1975年。高等教育辍学:最新研究的理论综述。 Bean,[1985年,《教育研究评论》,第45卷第1期,第89-125页]辍学意图模型。在大学生辍学综合症的解释模型中,基于班级的互动效应。 [American Educational Research Research Journal,22(1),35-64]社会化模型,Astin [1999年。学生参与:高等教育发展理论。大学生发展杂志,40(5),518-529]参与理论和服务营销文献,该研究提出了一个概念框架,用于分析学生的满意度,感知的学习成果和辍学意图。该框架可以更好地了解学生如何评估大学经历以及这些看法如何影响未来的意图。本文介绍了四项研究,这些研究使用来自三个国家的数据集和各种本科课程(商业,经济学,地理和护理)来测试框架的片段。使用结构方程模型对模型进行测试,并使用针对特定情况的问卷调查收集数据。这些模型能够解释研究的因变量,并为决策提供实用的工具。在各种情况下和不同的学生群体中评估概念框架的适用性。一个重要发现是,在解释学生的认知学习成果时,学生共创与感知服务质量同等重要,这反过来又说明了很高的​​满意度和情感学习成果。这项研究还阐明了情绪疲惫和辍学意图等变量的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号