...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Current thawing and infusion practice of cryopreserved cord blood: the impact on graft quality, recipient safety, and transplantation outcomes
【24h】

Current thawing and infusion practice of cryopreserved cord blood: the impact on graft quality, recipient safety, and transplantation outcomes

机译:当前冷冻保存的脐带血的解冻和输注实践:对移植质量,受体安全性和移植结果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Methods of handling, thawing, and infusion of cord blood (CB) products vary substantially among thaw/transplant centers (TCs). This review 1) compares currently available CB product types and thaw methods recommended by CB banks (CBBs), 2) discusses causes of inconsistency in thaw method application at TCs, 3) advises elements to consider in thaw method approval or selection at the TC, 4) provides a procedural template for the traditional thaw methods, and 5) suggests acceptable time from product thaw to infusion and other considerations for safe infusion. It also compares postinfusion adverse reaction and engraftment data as functions of thaw methods. Remarks and suggestions made throughout this review are: 1) not intended to supersede manufacturer's instructions but meant to support the standardization of preparative procedures recommended by CBBs and 2) intended to help TCs to investigate relevant quality issues and handle challenges, especially when the TC is unable to follow recommendations due to foreseeable technical, quality, and/or clinical factors.
机译:在解冻/移植中心(TC)中,处理,解冻和输注脐带血(CB)产品的方法大不相同。这篇评论1)比较了目前可用的CB产品类型和CB银行(CBB)推荐的解冻方法,2)讨论了TC的解冻方法应用不一致的原因,3)建议在TC的解冻方法批准或选择时要考虑的要素, 4)提供了传统解冻方法的程序模板,并且5)建议了从产品解冻到输液的可接受时间,以及其他考虑安全输液的注意事项。它还比较了输注后的不良反应和植入数据与融化方法的功能。整个审核过程中提出的意见和建议是:1)并非要取代制造商的说明,而是要支持CBB建议的制备程序的标准化; 2)旨在帮助TC调查相关质量问题和应对挑战,尤其是在由于可预见的技术,质量和/或临床因素而无法遵循建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号