...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Ten-year follow-up of unrelated volunteer granulocyte donors who have received multiple cycles of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and dexamethasone.
【24h】

Ten-year follow-up of unrelated volunteer granulocyte donors who have received multiple cycles of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and dexamethasone.

机译:接受了多个周期粒细胞集落刺激因子和地塞米松的无亲缘粒细胞捐献者的十年随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone is an effective granulocyte mobilization regimen. The short-term side effects of G-CSF are well studied, but the potential long-term effects of repeated G-CSF stimulation in unrelated volunteer granulocyte donors have not been reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donors who had received G-CSF three or more times for granulocytapheresis between 1994 and 2002 were identified and attempts were made to contact them if they were no longer active donors. They were matched with control platelet (PLT) donors for sex, age, and approximate number of cytapheresis donations. A health history was obtained and complete blood counts (CBCs) and C-reactive protein (CRP) determined where feasible. RESULTS: Ninety-two granulocyte donors were identified, and 83 of them were contacted. They contributed to 1120 granulocyte concentrates, or a mean of 13.5 granulocytapheresis procedures per donor (and a mean of 87.5 plateletpheresis procedures per donor). There was no difference in CBCs between the granulocyte donors and the control PLT donors. There was no difference in CRP between the two groups, and no difference in pre- and post-G-CSF CRP in a subset of 22 granulocyte donors. Predefined health events included malignancies, coronary artery disease, and thrombosis. At a median 10-year follow-up, there were seven such events in the granulocyte donors and five in the PLT donors. CONCLUSION: Although the number of granulocyte donors studied is small and continued surveillance of healthy individuals after G-CSF is prudent, our data suggest that G-CSF/dexamethasone stimulation appears to be safe.
机译:背景:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和地塞米松的组合是一种有效的粒细胞动员方案。 G-CSF的短期副作用已得到很好的研究,但尚未报道重复G-CSF刺激在无关的志愿粒细胞供体中的潜在长期影响。研究设计和方法:确定1994年至2002年间接受过3次或更多次G-CSF颗粒性单采的捐赠者,如果不再是活跃的捐赠者,则尝试与他们联系。他们与对照血小板(PLT)捐献者相匹配,以区分性别,年龄和大概的捐献次数。获得健康史,并在可行的情况下确定全血细胞计数(CBC)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。结果:鉴定出92个粒细胞供体,并与其中的83个接触。他们贡献了1120个粒细胞浓缩物,或每个供体平均进行了13.5个粒细胞清除术(每个供体平均进行了87.5个血小板清除术)。粒细胞供体和对照PLT供体之间的CBC没有差异。两组之间的CRP没有差异,在22个粒细胞供体的亚组中,G-CSF前后的CRP也没有差异。预定义的健康事件包括恶性肿瘤,冠状动脉疾病和血栓形成。在为期10年的中位随访中,粒细胞供体发生了7次此类事件,PLT供体发生了5次。结论:尽管研究的粒细胞供体的数量很少,并且谨慎监测G-CSF后的健康个体,但我们的数据表明G-CSF /地塞米松刺激似乎是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号