首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Establishment of an unrelated umbilical cord blood bank qualification program: Ensuring quality while meeting Food and Drug Administration vendor qualification requirements
【24h】

Establishment of an unrelated umbilical cord blood bank qualification program: Ensuring quality while meeting Food and Drug Administration vendor qualification requirements

机译:建立不相关的脐带血库资格认证计划:在满足食品药品监督管理局供应商资格要求的同时确保质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Qualification of a cord blood bank (CBB) is a complex process that includes evaluation of multiple aspects of donor screening and testing, processing, accreditation and approval by professional cell therapy groups, and results of received cord blood units. The University of Minnesota Medical Center Cell Therapy Laboratory has established a CBB vendor qualification process to ensure the CBB meets established regulatory and quality requirements. Study Design and Methods The deployed qualification of CBBs is based on retrospective and prospective review of the CBB. Results Forty-one CBBs were evaluated retrospectively: seven CBBs were disqualified based on failed quality control (QC) results. Eight CBBs did not meet the criteria for retrospective qualification because fewer than 3 cord blood units were received and the CBB was not accredited. As of March 2012, three US and one non-US CBBs have been qualified prospectively. One CBB withdrew from the qualification process after successful completion of the comprehensive survey and subsequent failure of the provided QC unit to pass the minimum criteria. One CBB failed the prospective qualification process based on processing methods that were revealed during the paper portion of the evaluation. Conclusions A CBB qualification process is necessary for a transplant center to manage the qualification of the large number of CBBs needed to support a umbilical cord blood transplantation program. A transplant center that has utilized cord blood for a number of years before implementation of a qualification process should use a retrospective qualification process along with a prospective process.
机译:背景脐带血库(CBB)的鉴定是一个复杂的过程,包括评估供体筛选和测试,处理,专业细胞治疗小组的认可和批准的多个方面,以及接收到的脐带血单位的结果。明尼苏达大学医学中心大学细胞治疗实验室已经建立了CBB供应商认证程序,以确保CBB满足既定的法规和质量要求。研究设计和方法部署的CBB资格认证基于CBB的回顾性和前瞻性审查。结果回顾性评估了41个CBB:根据失败的质量控制(QC)结果取消了7个CBB的资格。 8个CBB不符合回顾性资格标准,因为接收的脐血单位少于3个,并且CBB不合格。截至2012年3月,三家美国和一类非美国CBB均已获得合格资格。在成功完成全面调查并且随后所提供的质量控制部门未能通过最低标准之后,一名CBB退出了资格审查程序。一名CBB根据评估纸质部分中揭示的处理方法,未能通过预期的资格审查程序。结论对于移植中心管理支持脐带血移植计划所需的大量CBB的资格鉴定,CBB资格鉴定过程是必要的。在实施鉴定程序之前已经使用脐带血多年的移植中心应同时使用回顾性鉴定程序和前瞻性程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号