首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Survival of red blood cells after transfusion: a comparison between red cells concentrates of different storage periods.
【24h】

Survival of red blood cells after transfusion: a comparison between red cells concentrates of different storage periods.

机译:输血后红细胞的存活:不同储存期的红细胞浓缩物之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The use of fresh red blood cells (RBCs) is recommended for critically ill patients and patients undergoing surgery, although there is no conclusive evidence that this is beneficial. In this follow-up study, the short-term and the long-term recovery of irradiated, leukoreduced RBCs transfused after either a short storage (SS) or a long storage (LS) period were compared. By consecutive transfusion of RBCs with a SS and LS period, a direct comparison of their survival within the same patient was possible. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten transfusion-requiring patients each received a SS RCCs (stored 0-10 days) and a LS RCCs (stored 25-35 days) consecutively. Short-term and long-term survival of the transfused RBCs was followed by flow cytometry using natural differences in RBC antigens between donors and patients. Posttransfusion recovery (PTR) was measured at several time points after transfusion. RESULTS: The mean 24-hour PTR of SS RBCs is 86.4 +/- 17.8 percent and that of LS RBCs 73.5 +/- 13.7percent. After the first 24 hours, the mean times to reach a PTR of 50 percent of the 24-hour PTR (T50) and mean potential life spans (mPLs) of the surviving SS and LS RBCs (41 and 116 days and 41 and 114 days, respectively) do not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The mean 24-hour PTR of both SS and LS RBCs complies with the guidelines, even in a compromised patient population. The 24-hour PTR of SS RBCs, however, is significantly higher than that of LS RBCs. The remaining population of SS and LS RBCs has a nearly identical long-term survival. Therefore, depletion of the removal-prone RBCs before transfusion may be an efficient approach for product improvement.
机译:背景:尽管尚无确凿证据表明这是有益的,但建议重症患者和接受手术的患者使用新鲜的红细胞(RBC)。在此后续研究中,比较了短期(SS)或长期(LS)时期后输注的经辐射,白细胞减少的RBC的短期和长期恢复。通过连续输注SS和LS期的RBC,可以直接比较其在同一患者中的存活率。研究设计和方法:10名需要输血的患者分别接受SS RCC(存储0-10天)和LS RCC(存储25-35天)。使用供体和患者之间RBC抗原的自然差异,通过流式细胞术监测输血RBC的短期和长期存活。输血后几个时间点测量输血后恢复(PTR)。结果:SS RBC的平均24小时PTR为86.4 +/- 17.8%,而LS RBC的平均24小时PTR为73.5 +/- 13.7%。在最初的24小时之后,达到PTR的24小时PTR(T50)的50%的平均时间以及尚存的SS和LS RBC的平均潜在寿命(mPL)(41天,116天,41天和114天) )。结论:SS和LS RBC的平均24小时PTR均符合指南要求,即使在患者群体受损的情况下也是如此。但是,SS RBC的24小时PTR明显高于LS RBC的24小时PTR。 SS和LS RBC的剩余种群具有几乎相同的长期生存率。因此,在输血前清除易于去除的红细胞可能是提高产品质量的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号