首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Platelet activation during plasma-reduced multicomponent PLT collection: a comparison between COBE Trima and Spectra LRS turbo cell separators.
【24h】

Platelet activation during plasma-reduced multicomponent PLT collection: a comparison between COBE Trima and Spectra LRS turbo cell separators.

机译:血浆减少的多组分PLT收集过程中的血小板活化:COBE Trima和Spectra LRS涡轮细胞分离器之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The wide diffusion of multicomponent collection in donor apheresis has led to the yielding of different components, such as plasma-reduced platelet-pheresis at high PLT concentration. We investigated whether this collection modality could induce more PLT activation compared to standard plateletpheresis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-one plateletpheresis collections (20 Trima and 21 Spectra LRS Turbo v.7.0, COBE) were evaluated. Donor, procedure, and product data were recorded. ADP, collagen, and U46619 (a thromboxane-A2 analog)-induced PLT aggregation was investigated in basal (donor) and final (plateletpheresis unit) samples. The expression of PLT activation marker P-selectin (CD62P) was studied using flow cytometry in basal and final samples. In all cases, P-selectin was investigated in final samples after stimulation with ADP to assess for a possible further release of the antigen. Four additional plateletpheresis procedures were performed in donors from Group A, using the traditional,nonplasma-reduced program. RESULTS: Plateletpheresis obtained by means of the Trima device showed a lower response to in-vitro induced PLT aggregation and a higher percentage of P-selectin-expressing PLT when compared to products obtained using the Spectra device. Moreover, P-selectin release after ADP stimulation was reduced in plateletpheresis units obtained using the Trima device. These differences disappeared when a nonplasma-reduced collection program was used. In-vivo evaluation did not detect any difference between plateletpheresis obtained by means of the two cell separators. CONCLUSIONS: Plateletpheresis units obtained by means of multicomponent collection show a higher degree of PLT activation compared to traditional plateletpheresis procedures when high-concentration plasma-reduced products are collected. Randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the real impact of these findings in terms of in-vivo efficacy of plasma-reduced plateletpheresis units.
机译:背景:多成分收集在供血者单采血液中的广泛扩散已导致产生不同成分,例如在高PLT浓度下血浆降低的血小板单采。我们调查了这种收集方式是否与标准血小板减少术相比可以诱导更多的PLT活化。研究设计和方法:评估了41个血小板收集术(20个Trima和21个Spectra LRS Turbo v.7.0,COBE)。记录捐赠者,程序和产品数据。在基础(供体)和最终(血小板分离单位)样品中研究了ADP,胶原蛋白和U46619(血栓烷-A2类似物)诱导的PLT聚集。使用流式细胞术研究了基础和最终样品中PLT激活标记P-选择蛋白(CD62P)的表达。在所有情况下,在用ADP刺激后对最终样品中的P-选择素进行了研究,以评估抗原是否可能进一步释放。使用传统的,无血浆减少的程序,在A组供体中进行了另外四次血小板减少程序。结果:与使用Spectra装置获得的产品相比,通过Trima装置获得的血小板减少显示出对体外诱导的PLT聚集的较低反应,并且表达P选择素的PLT百分比较高。此外,使用Trima装置获得的血小板减少术单位减少了ADP刺激后P选择素的释放。当使用非血浆减少的收集程序时,这些差异消失了。体内评估未检测到通过两个细胞分离器获得的血小板减少之间的任何差异。结论:与传统的血小板减少程序相比,通过多组分收集获得的血小板减少单元在收集高浓度血浆还原产物时显示出更高的PLT活化程度。需要随机临床研究来评估这些发现对血浆减少的血小板减少单位的体内功效的实际影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号