首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical apheresis. >Mononuclear cell collection in patients treated with extracorporeal photochemotherapy by using the off-line method: a comparison between COBE Spectra AutoPbsc version 6.1 and Amicus cell separators.
【24h】

Mononuclear cell collection in patients treated with extracorporeal photochemotherapy by using the off-line method: a comparison between COBE Spectra AutoPbsc version 6.1 and Amicus cell separators.

机译:使用离线方法进行体外光化学治疗的患者的单核细胞收集:COBE Spectra AutoPbsc 6.1版和Amicus细胞分离器之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The first step (MNC collection) during extracorporeal photochemotherapy by using the off-line method is of paramount importance, since the product should be highly MNC-enriched with low RBC count to avoid UV-A intercepting by erythrocytes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 10 patients (nine with chronic GvHD and one with bullous pemphigoid) underwent MNC collection on subsequent days either with the COBE Spectra AutoPbsc version 6.1 or the Amicus Crescendo cell separator. Total and differential WBC count were performed on peripheral blood samples before procedure and on the yields. The procedure parameters were recorded for comparison between the two devices. Analysis included descriptive statistics and paired t-test. RESULTS: No clinically relevant side effect with the exception of mild paresthesias was observed during the 20 MNC collections. Furthermore, no difference were observed as to pre-collection hematological parameters. The mean total nucleated cell count in the yield was 6.99 +/- 2.39 x 10(9) with a MNC content of 5.9 +/- 2.19 x 10(9) in the Spectra group and 6.15 +/- 2.02 x 10(9) with 5.29 +/- 2.39 x 10(9) in the Amicus group (P = 0.407 and P = 0.540, respectively). PLT content was higher in the yield from the Spectra group when compared to the Amicus group (1.54 x 10(11) +/- 0.74 vs. 0.53 x 10(11) +/- 0.34, P = 0.001). Moreover, no difference were observed in the RBC content in the product : 3.38 mL +/- 1.91 vs. 4.59 mL +/- 2.09, P = 0.191, when COBE Spectra and Amicus were compared, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices provide a satisfactory MNC collection for further UV-A treatment.
机译:背景:通过离线方法进行体外光化学疗法的第一步(收集MNC)至关重要,因为该产品应高度MNC富集,且RBC计数低,以避免UV-A被红细胞拦截。材料与方法:10例患者(9例患有慢性GvHD,1例患有大疱性类天疱疮)在随后几天接受MNC收集,或者使用COBE Spectra AutoPbsc 6.1版或Amicus Crescendo细胞分离器。在手术前对外周血样品进行总白细胞计数和差异白细胞计数,并对产量进行计数。记录过程参数以在两个设备之间进行比较。分析包括描述性统计和配对t检验。结果:在20个MNC采集过程中,除轻度感觉异常外,未观察到临床相关的副作用。此外,在收集前血液学参数方面未观察到差异。 Spectra组中平均总有核细胞计数为6.99 +/- 2.39 x 10(9),MNC含量为5.9 +/- 2.19 x 10(9),而6.15 +/- 2.02 x 10(9)在Amicus组中为5.29 +/- 2.39 x 10(9)(分别为P = 0.407和P = 0.540)。与Amicus组相比,Spectra组的PLT含量更高(1.54 x 10(11)+/- 0.74对0.53 x 10(11)+/- 0.34,P = 0.001)。此外,当分别比较COBE Spectra和Amicus时,产品中RBC含量没有差异:3.38 mL +/- 1.91对4.59 mL +/- 2.09,P = 0.191。结论:这两种设备都提供了令人满意的MNC收集品,可以进一步进行UV-A处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号