...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Does blood donor history accurately reflect the use of prescription medications? A comparison of donor history and serum toxicologic analysis.
【24h】

Does blood donor history accurately reflect the use of prescription medications? A comparison of donor history and serum toxicologic analysis.

机译:献血者的病史是否准确反映处方药的使用?供体病史和血清毒理学分析的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Blood donor screening is performed to accomplish several goals, including donor safety during collection and recipient safety during transfusion. Donors taking certain medications such as teratogens or platelet-inhibiting drugs are deferred from donation. Studies investigating the accuracy of the donor history are limited and only provide data on select groups of drugs. This study compares the results of an extended serum toxicology analysis to the medication use reported on the donor questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole-blood samples were collected from 108 volunteer blood donors. A serum toxicology analysis was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. The results were compared to those reported on the donor history questionnaire. RESULTS: The medication history was consistent with the reported medications in 96 (89%) donors. Serum toxicology testing detected medications that were not reported on the donor history form in 12 (11%) donors. Most of the donors who did not accurately report their medication use (8 or 67%) were taking psychotropic medications. CONCLUSION: Eleven percent of the donors did not fully disclose their recent medication history. Although none of the omitted medications would have been grounds for deferral, the finding of underreporting questions the reliability of donor screening. Despite a negative medication history, blood donor centers cannot assume that donors are medication-free. This study reveals a bias to omit psychotropic medications such as antidepressants and anxiolytics.
机译:背景:献血者筛查是为了完成几个目标而进行的,包括收集过程中的献血者安全和输血过程中的接受者安全。捐赠某些药物(例如致畸物或抑制血小板的药物)的捐赠者被推迟捐赠。研究捐赠者病史准确性的研究是有限的,仅提供有关精选药物组的数据。这项研究将扩展的血清毒理学分析结果与捐赠者问卷上报告的药物使用进行了比较。研究设计和方法:从108名自愿献血者那里采集全血样本。用带有光电二极管阵列检测的高效液相色谱法进行血清毒理学分析。将结果与捐助者历史问卷上报告的结果进行比较。结果:用药史与96名(89%)供体中报道的用药一致。血清毒理学测试检测到12名(11%)供体中未在供体历史表上报告的药物。大多数没有准确报告用药情况的捐助者(8%或67%)正在服用精神药物。结论:11%的捐助者没有完全披露他们最近的用药史。尽管所有遗漏的药物都不会成为延期的理由,但漏报的发现对捐赠者筛查的可靠性提出了质疑。尽管有不良的用药史,但献血者中心不能假定献血者是无药的。这项研究揭示了省略诸如抗抑郁药和抗焦虑药之类的精神药物的偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号