...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity.
【24h】

Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity.

机译:根据HLA抗体特异性为难治性患者选择血小板供体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients who are refractory to platelet transfusion as a result of HLA alloimmunization are generally given HLA-matched or crossmatched platelets. However, HLA-matched platelets that are matched at HLA-A and -B loci (A-matched) or those without any mismatched or cross-reactive antigens (BU-matched) are frequently unavailable. A disadvantage of crossmatching is that crossmatched platelets have a shelf life of only 5 days, so that crossmatch tests must be performed frequently for patients requiring long-term platelet transfusions. An alternative method is the selection of platelets according to the patient's HLA antibody specificity, called the antibody specificity prediction (ASP) method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anti-human globulin-enhanced microlymphocytotoxicity test modified by a double addition of serum and a computer program were used to determine the specificity of patients' HLA antibodies. Platelet crossmatching was performed with a solid-phase adherence assay. The percentage of platelet recovery (PPR) was determined in 1621 platelet transfusions in an observational study in 114 patients, and the PPR of platelets selected by the ASP method was compared with the PPR of those that were HLA-matched, crossmatched, or randomly selected. The numbers of potential donors in files of HLA-typed donors as identified by HLA matching vs. the ASP method were determined. RESULTS: After adjustments for covariates, the mean +/- SEM PPR was similar for HLA-matched (21 +/-4%), cross-matched (23+/-4%), and ASP-selected (24+/-3%) platelets and was significantly lower for randomly selected (15+/-1.4%) platelets. For 29 alloimmunized HLA-typed patients, the mean number of potential donors found in a file of 7247 HLA-typed donors was 6 who were an HLA-A match (median = 1), 33 who were an HLA-BU match (median = 20), and 1426 who were identified by the ASP method (median = 1365). CONCLUSION: The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more donors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important advantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.
机译:背景:由于HLA同种免疫而使血小板输注困难的患者通常接受HLA匹配或交叉匹配的血小板。但是,通常无法获得在HLA-A和-B基因座处匹配的HLA匹配血小板(A匹配)或没有任何错配或交叉反应的抗原(BU匹配)的血小板。交叉匹配的缺点是,交叉匹配的血小板的保质期仅为5天,因此必须对需要长期输血的患者频繁进行交叉匹配测试。另一种方法是根据患者的HLA抗体特异性选择血小板,称为抗体特异性预测(ASP)方法。研究设计和方法:通过添加两次血清和计算机程序修改的抗人球蛋白增强的微淋巴细胞毒性试验用于确定患者HLA抗体的特异性。用固相粘附测定法进行血小板交叉匹配。在一项114例患者的观察性研究中,在1621例输血中确定了血小板恢复(PPR)的百分比,并将通过ASP方法选择的血小板的PPR与HLA匹配,交叉匹配或随机选择的血小板的PPR进行了比较。 。确定通过HLA匹配vs. ASP方法确定的HLA型供体文件中潜在供体的数量。结果:校正协变量后,HLA匹配(21 +/- 4%),交叉匹配(23 +/- 4%)和ASP选择(24 +/-)的平均值+/- SEM PPR相似3%的血小板,而随机选择的(15 +/- 1.4%)血小板则明显降低。对于29名同种免疫HLA型患者,在7247个HLA型供体档案中发现的潜在供体平均数为6名HLA-A匹配(中位数= 1),33名HLA-BU匹配(中位数= 20),以及1426人(通过ASP方法确定)(中位数= 1365)。结论:难治性同种免疫患者的ASP供体选择方法与HLA匹配或交叉匹配一样有效。通过ASP方法比通过HLA匹配在HLA型供体文件中识别的供体要多得多,这表明ASP方法在兼容血小板成分的可用性方面具有重要优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号