【24h】

Give Consumers Their Say

机译:给予消费者意见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Discussing the future of the smart grid implies that we now have a "dumb grid," which I don't accept since our nation's record of electric reliability is probably as good as any country in the world. The grid of today, which in many ways is similar to the grid of 50 years ago, can be improved and improved substantially. But do we need a smart grid or just a smarter grid, and if so, how much smarter? As we ponder needed improvements, the question comes down to cost: What's the total price and who will pay for it? As an advocate for consumers, I know of few consumers, large or small, who want a smart grid or its first offspring, a smart meter, right now.
机译:讨论智能电网的未来意味着我们现在有了一个“哑电网”,我不接受,因为我们国家的电力可靠性记录可能与世界上任何国家都一样。今天的网格在很多方面都与50年前的网格相似,可以得到很大的改善。但是,我们需要智能电网还是仅仅是智能电网,如果需要,那么智能多少?当我们考虑需要改进时,问题就落到了成本上:总价是多少,谁来支付?作为消费者的拥护者,我知道现在很少有大小智能的消费者想要智能电网或其第一个后代,即智能电表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号