首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Head Injury Causation Scenarios for Belted, Rear-Seated Children in Frontal Impacts
【24h】

Head Injury Causation Scenarios for Belted, Rear-Seated Children in Frontal Impacts

机译:正面撞击的腰带,后坐儿童头部受伤的原因情景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Head injuries are the most common serious injuries sustained by children in motor vehicle crashes and are of critical importance with regard to long-term disability. There is a lack of understanding of how seat belt-restrained children sustain head injuries in frontal impacts. The aim of the study was to identify the AIS2+ head injury causation scenarios for rear-seated, belt-restrained children in frontal impacts, including the set of parameters contributing to the injury. Method: In-depth crash investigations from two National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) databases, the National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS; 1997-2008) and the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN; 1996-2009), were collected and analyzed in detail. Selection criteria were all frontal impacts with principal direction of force (PDOF) of 11, 12, and 1 o'clock involving rear-seated, three-point belt-restrained, with or without booster cushion, children from 3 to 13 years with an AIS2+ head injury. Cases were analyzed using the BioTab method of injury causation assessment in order to systematically analyze the injury causation scenario for each case. Results: There were 27 cases meeting the inclusion criteria, 19 cases with MAIS2 head injuries and 8 cases with MAIS3+ head injuries, including 2 fatalities. Three major injury causation scenarios were identified, including head contact with seatback (10 cases), head contact with side interior (7 cases,) and no evidence of head contact (9 cases). Conclusions: Head injuries with seatback or side interior contact typically included a PDOF greater than 10 degree (similar to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety [IIHS] and EuroNCAP offset frontal testing) and vehicle maneuvers. For seatback contact, the vehicle's movements contributed to occupant kinematics inboard the vehicle, causing a less than optimal restraint of the torso and/or torso roll out of the shoulder belt. For side interior contact, the PDOF and/or maneuvers forced the occupant toward the side interior. The cases without evidence of head/face contact were characterized by high crash severity and accompanied by severe injuries to the thorax and spine. These data lead to increased understanding of the injury patterns and causation in this crash restraint scenario so that interventions to mitigate the burden of injury can be advanced.
机译:目标:头部受伤是儿童在机动车碰撞中最常见的严重伤害,对于长期残疾而言至关重要。对于受安全带约束的儿童在正面撞击时如何承受头部受伤,人们缺乏了解。该研究的目的是确定在正面撞击中后坐带约束的儿童的AIS2 +头部伤害原因,包括造成伤害的参数集。方法:从两个国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)数据库,国家汽车采样系统-耐撞性数据系统(NASS-CDS; 1997-2008)和碰撞伤害研究与工程网络(CIREN; 1996- 2009年),并进行了详细分析。选择标准是主力方向(PDOF)为11、12和1点钟的所有正面撞击,包括后坐,三点式安全带约束,有无缓冲垫,3至13岁的儿童AIS2 +头部受伤。使用BioTab伤害因果关系评估方法对案例进行分析,以便系统地分析每个案例的伤害因果关系情景。结果:符合入选标准的27例,MAIS2颅脑损伤19例,MAIS3 +颅脑损伤8例,其中有2人死亡。确定了三种主要的伤害原因场景,包括头部与椅背接触(10例),头部与侧面内部接触(7例)和无头部接触的证据(9例)。结论:座椅靠背或侧面内部接触导致的头部受伤通常包括大于10度的PDOF(类似于高速公路安全保险研究所[IIHS]和EuroNCAP偏置正面测试)和车辆操纵。对于座椅靠背的接触,车辆的运动有助于车辆内部的乘员运动,从而导致躯干约束和/或躯干从肩带滑落的程度低于最佳。对于侧面内部接触,PDOF和/或操纵将乘员推向侧面内部。没有头/脸接触证据的病例的特征是高碰撞严重度,并伴有胸部和脊柱严重受伤。这些数据使人们对这种碰撞约束情形中的伤害模式和因果关系有了更多的了解,从而可以进行减轻伤害负担的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号