...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Ejection and Severe Injury Risks by Crash Type and Belt Use With a Focus on Rear Impacts
【24h】

Ejection and Severe Injury Risks by Crash Type and Belt Use With a Focus on Rear Impacts

机译:撞车类型和安全带使用引起的弹出和严重伤害风险,重点放在后方撞击

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: This study investigated the risk of severe-to-fatal injury (MAIS 4+F) with complete and partial ejection by crash type and belt use with a focus on ejection in rear impacts. Methods: 1993-2007 NASS-CDS was analyzed for crashes with complete and partial ejection. The effect of belt use was investigated and crashes were grouped by front, side, rear, and rollovers. Light vehicles were included with model year 1994+. Injuries of severity MAIS 4+F and AIS 3-6 by body region were determined by crash type, belt use, and ejection status. NASS-CDS electronic cases of complete ejection and serious injury were evaluated to determine the circumstances in rear impacts. Results: For unbelted occupants, the highest risk for complete ejection is in rollovers (16.4 ± 1.1%) and the risk for severe injury is 37.6 ± 2.7%. The lowest risk for complete ejection is in frontal crashes (0.97 ± 0.22%), but the risk for serious injury is 31.3 ± 6.2% when ejection occurs. The risk for ejection is 2.7 ± 1.5% in rear impacts with a 7.4 ± 3.4% risk for severe injury. For belted occupants, the highest risk for complete ejection is in rollovers (0.068 ± 0.022%) and the risk for severe injury is 25.9 ± 13.3% when ejection occurs. The relative risk for ejection is 193 times greater for unbelted compared to belted occupants in all crashes with a range of 100 times in frontal crashes up to 847 times in rear impacts. Unbelted occupants have 20 times greater risk for severe injury when completely ejected and 18 times greater risk with partial ejection compared to nonejected occupants. Belted occupants have a 77 times greater risk of severe injury when completely ejected and 37 times greater risk when partially ejected. Conclusions: Ejection involves significantly higher risks for severe injury in all crash types. The relative risk for MAIS 4+F injury is 20 times greater for unbelted and 77 times greater for belted occupants who are completely ejected compared to nonejected occupants. Ejection of occupants in rear crashes often occurs during vehicle yaw motion after the primary impact.
机译:目的:本研究调查了撞车类型和安全带完全和部分弹射的严重到致命伤害(MAIS 4 + F)的风险,重点是后方撞击时弹射。方法:对1993-2007年NASS-CDS进行了完全和部分弹出的坠毁分析。对安全带使用的影响进行了调查,并根据前,侧,后和侧翻对撞车进行了分组。轻型车辆已包含在1994+车型年中。根据碰撞部位,安全带使用情况和弹射状态确定身体部位MAIS 4 + F和AIS 3-6严重程度的伤害。对NASS-CDS电子弹药完全弹出并造成严重伤害的情况进行了评估,以确定后方撞击的情况。结果:对于未系安全带的乘员,完全弹射的最高风险是侧翻(16.4±1.1%),严重伤害的风险为37.6±2.7%。完全弹出的最低风险是正面碰撞(0.97±0.22%),但弹出时发生严重伤害的风险为31.3±6.2%。在向后撞击时,弹射的风险为2.7±1.5%,重伤的风险为7.4±3.4%。对于安全带乘员,完全弹出的最高风险是发生侧翻(0.068±0.022%),弹出时发生严重伤害的风险为25.9±13.3%。与所有安全带乘员相比,在所有碰撞中,未系安全带的相对弹出风险是带状乘员的193倍,正面碰撞的范围为100倍,后部碰撞的范围为847倍。与未出射的乘员相比,未系安全带的乘员完全被弹出时遭受重伤的风险高,而部分弹射的乘员则有18倍高的风险。安全带乘员被完全弹射时遭受严重伤害的危险高77倍,部分被弹射者遭受严重伤害的风险高37倍。结论:在所有撞车类型中,弹射涉及的重伤风险明显更高。与没有安全带出的乘员相比,完全没有安全带的安全带乘员的MAIS 4 + F伤害的相对风险要大20倍,而安全带乘员则要高77倍。在主撞击之后的车辆横摆运动期间,经常发生后方碰撞中的乘员弹出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号