首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Investigating Motorists' Behaviors in Response to Supplementary Traffic Control Devices at Land Surveying Work Sites
【24h】

Investigating Motorists' Behaviors in Response to Supplementary Traffic Control Devices at Land Surveying Work Sites

机译:调查土地测量工作现场驾驶员对辅助交通控制设备的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Since land surveyors working alongside live traffic encounter unique safety challenges there is a great need for innovative and effective traffic control devices (TCDs) that alert motorists approaching short-term land surveying work sites. Unlike the volume of research that has been completed on traditional work zones, however, there is a limited amount of information that has been collected on how motorists respond to TCDs at land surveying work sites. This article aims to fill the void by investigating motorists' behaviors in response to the use of 2 supplementary TCDs at land surveying work sites: portable plastic rumble strips (PPRS) and warning lights. Method: Extensive field tests were conducted at various land surveying work sites on 2-lane 2-way urban roadways in New Jersey. Scenarios with and without the use of the supplemental TCDs were designed. Motorists' behavior changes were then statistically examined by using surrogate safety measures including mean speed, speed variance, speed limit compliance, and braking action. Results: Statistical analyses showed that the traffic speed variations did not significantly increase when the selected supplemental TCD was used; rather, motorists significantly reduced their driving speed. When warning lights and PPRS were separately deployed at the land surveying work sites the average reduction in mean speed was 6.7 and 15.2 percent, respectively. The mean speed was reduced by 19.7 percent when both of these supplementary TCDs were used. Logistic regression models developed to examine the speeding and braking behavior also showed that motorists were more likely to comply with the speed limit and increase their braking rate when the selected TCDs were used. Conclusion: The use of supplemental TCDs can greatly contribute to the changes in motorists' behaviors at surveying work sites. The changes in motorists' driving behaviors imply that the motorists reacted favorably to the deployed TCDs at the land-surveying work sites.
机译:目标:由于与现场交通一起工作的土地测量师面临独特的安全挑战,因此迫切需要创新和有效的交通控制设备(TCD),以提醒驾车者接近短期土地测量工作现场。但是,与传统工作区上已完成的大量研究不同,在土地测量工作现场收集的关于驾车人士如何响应TCD的信息很少。本文旨在通过调查驾车者在土地测量工作地点使用2种补充TCD的行为来填补空白,这些塑料Tumbled Strips(PPRS)和警示灯是在地面上使用的。方法:在新泽西州2车道2车道城市道路上的各种土地测量工作现场进行了广泛的现场测试。设计了使用或不使用补充性TCD的方案。然后使用替代安全措施,包括平均速度,速度变化,限速遵守和制动动作,对驾驶员的行为变化进行统计检查。结果:统计分析表明,使用所选的补充TCD时,交通速度变化没有明显增加;相反,驾驶者大大降低了他们的驾驶速度。当在土地测量工作现场分别部署警示灯和PPRS时,平均速度分别降低了6.7%和15.2%。当同时使用这两种补充性TCD时,平均速度降低了19.7%。为检查速度和制动行为而开发的逻辑回归模型还显示,驾驶者在使用选定的TCD时更有可能遵守速度限制并提高其制动率。结论:使用补充性TCD可以极大地改变测量现场驾驶员的行为。驾车者驾驶行为的变化意味着驾车者对在土地测量工作现场部署的TCD做出了积极反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号