...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Can Patients Receiving Opioid Maintenance Therapy Safely Drive? A Systematic Review of Epidemiological and Experimental Studies on Driving Ability With a Focus on Concomitant Methadone or Buprenorphine Administration
【24h】

Can Patients Receiving Opioid Maintenance Therapy Safely Drive? A Systematic Review of Epidemiological and Experimental Studies on Driving Ability With a Focus on Concomitant Methadone or Buprenorphine Administration

机译:接受阿片类药物维持治疗的患者能否安全开车?对驾驶能力的流行病学和实验研究的系统评价,重点是美沙酮或丁丙诺啡同时给药

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To perform a systematic review of the present scientific literature on the treatment with methadone or buprenorphine related to (1) traffic accident risk in epidemiological studies and (2) their effects on cognitive and psychomotor functions of relevance to driving in experimental studies. Methods: Searches for corresponding literature were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO throughout March and June of 2010. The search strategy consisted of words colligated to accident risk and culpability, in addition to cognitive and psychomotor functions of relevance to driving, all in relation to methadone or buprenorphine administration. In total, 59 studies were included. Results: Early epidemiological studies found no substantial difference in motor vehicle accident risk between methadone maintenance therapy patients (MMPs) and control groups. However, more recent studies have found an increased risk of traffic accident involvement for both MMPs and buprenorphine maintenance therapy patients (BMPs). In experimental studies, impairments of cognitive and psychomotor functions have been observed among both MMPs and BMPs when compared to control groups. When comparing MMPs with BMPs, the latter appeared to be less impaired than MMPs, but this difference may be unrelated to the maintenance therapy. Further impairments have been observed among MMPs after single doses, after an additional versus regular daily dosing, in multiple versus single dosing, and after long-term treatment compared to baseline levels. All studies showed impairments among opioid-naive subjects after the administration of a comparatively low and single dose of either methadone or buprenorphine. Conclusions: Both methadone and buprenorphine were confirmed as having impairing potentials in opioid-naive subjects. At least some opioid maintenance therapy patients are observed having only slight impairments of relevance to driving. Knowing this when approaching the question of ability to drive, an individual evaluation of the driving performance, pertaining to the opioid maintained patient, may be the most useful and conclusive procedure. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Traffic Injury Prevention to view the supplemental file.
机译:目的:对有关美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的现有科学文献进行系统综述,涉及以下方面:(1)流行病学研究中的交通事故风险,以及(2)实验研究中它们对与驾驶相关的认知和心理运动功能的影响。方法:在2010年3月至6月期间,在MEDLINE,EMBASE和PsycINFO中进行了相应的文献检索。检索策略包括与事故风险和易受伤害性相关的单词,以及与驾驶相关的认知和心理运动功能美沙酮或丁丙诺啡给药。总共包括59项研究。结果:早期的流行病学研究发现,美沙酮维持治疗患者(MMPs)与对照组之间的机动车事故风险没有实质性差异。但是,最近的研究发现,MMP和丁丙诺啡维持疗法患者(BMP)均会发生交通事故。在实验研究中,与对照组相比,在MMP和BMP中都观察到了认知和精神运动功能的损害。在将MMP与BMP进行比较时,后者似乎比MMP受到的损害更少,但是这种差异可能与维持疗法无关。与基线水平相比,在单剂量给药后,在每日常规剂量与常规剂量之间,多次给药与单次给药之间以及长期治疗后,与基线水平相比,在MMP中观察到了进一步的损伤。所有研究均显示,在服用相对较低且单剂量的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡后,初次服用阿片类药物的受试者会受到损害。结论:美沙酮和丁丙诺啡均被证实对未接受过阿片类药物的受试者具有潜在的损害作用。观察到至少一些阿片类药物维持治疗患者的驾驶相关性仅有轻微的损害。在解决驾驶能力问题时,知道这一点,对维持阿片类药物的患者进行驾驶表现的单独评估可能是最有用和结论性的程序。补充材料可用于本文。转到发布者的在线交通伤害预防在线版本以查看补充文件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号