首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology: An International Journal Concerned with the Effects of Chemicals on Living Systems >The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing.
【24h】

The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing.

机译:研究设计和性别差异对双酚A发育神经毒性研究结果的影响,这对毒性测试具有重要意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) of bisphenol A (BPA) has been investigated in a large number of studies. However, there are discrepancies in the results reported between the studies. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze factors that may contribute to these differences and to assess whether there are sex-differences in the sensitivity of certain endpoints or tests used in DNT-studies. Forty-four DNT studies of BPA were identified from the open literature. Details about study design and results from each study, as well as the criteria for DNT testing according to the standardized OECD test guideline (TG) 426, were collected in a database. This enabled systematic and detailed comparisons between studies as well as to the criteria and recommendations stated in TG 426. Multivariate analyses were also used to investigate how different factors of the study design contributed to differences in study results. The analyses showed behavioral effects were often observed for endpoints that are not required according to OECD TG 426, such as anxiety-related, social and sexual behaviors, especially at very low doses and in female offspring. On the other hand relatively few studies observed any effects on motor activity, which is commonly used in screening for neurotoxic effects in regulatory testing. However, varied and to some extent seemingly contradictory results have been reported in these studies, especially for endpoints related to motor activity and anxiety and exploration. Many studies were also poorly reported, limiting these analyses. No strong conclusions could be drawn from the multivariate analyses. A few factors of study design, such as the size of the dose and number of dose levels used and the use of litter or individual pup as statistical unit seemed to have some influence on study results. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that DNT-studies conducted according to the standardized OECD TG 426 may overlook sensitive effects of BPA, and possibly other potential endocrine disruptors, especially in female offspring.
机译:在许多研究中已经研究了双酚A(BPA)的发育性神经毒性(DNT)。但是,研究之间报告的结果存在差异。这项研究的目的是识别和分析可能导致这些差异的因素,并评估在DNT研究中使用的某些终点或测试的敏感性是否存在性别差异。从公开文献中确定了BPA的44个DNT研究。在数据库中收集了有关研究设计和每个研究的结果的详细信息,以及根据标准化OECD测试准则(TG)426进行DNT测试的标准。这样就可以进行研究之间的系统和详细比较,以及TG 426中所述的标准和建议。还使用多变量分析来研究研究设计的不同因素如何导致研究结果的差异。分析表明,经常观察到对于行为没有OECD TG 426所要求的终点的影响,例如与焦虑相关的社交和性行为,特别是在极低剂量下以及在雌性后代中。另一方面,相对较少的研究观察到对运动活动的任何影响,这通常用于筛查监管测试中的神经毒性作用。然而,在这些研究中报道了各种各样的结果,并且在某种程度上看似矛盾的结果,特别是对于与运动活动,焦虑和探索有关的终点。许多研究报告也很少,限制了这些分析。从多元分析中不能得出有力的结论。研究设计的一些因素,例如剂量的大小和使用的剂量水平的数量以及使用垫料或幼崽作为统计单位似乎对研究结果有一定影响。总之,该分析表明,根据标准化的OECD TG 426进行的DNT研究可能忽略了BPA的敏感作用,可能还忽略了其他潜在的内分泌干扰物,尤其是在雌性后代中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号