首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii).
【24h】

An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii).

机译:两种抗蛇毒血清用于治疗斯里兰卡罗素毒蛇(Daboia russelii russelii)的毒蛇毒的开放式,随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in Sri Lanka. In a study in 1985, Haffkine equine polyspecific antivenom in doses up to 20 g proved ineffective in clearing antigenaemia and caused a high incidence of anaphylactoid reactions. A new, monospecific ovine Fabantivenom (Polonga TAb) has been developed against the venom of Sri Lankan Russell's viper and, to assess its safety and efficacy, we carried out (in 1997) an open, randomized comparison of this with the Haffkine antivenom currently in use in the country. Patients with systemic envenoming following Russell's viper bite were randomized to receive an initial intravenous dose of either 1 g of Polonga TAb (n = 23) or 10 g of Haffkine antivenom (n = 20). One dose of Polonga TAb permanently restored blood coagulability in only 9 (41%) of 22 patients and 13 needed repeated doses, whereas the majority (14/20; 70%) had restored coagulability after 1 dose of Haffkine antivenom. There was a tendency towards more rapid resolution of local swelling and systemic manifestations in the Haffkine group. Venom antigenaemia was eliminated more quickly in the Haffkine group and ovine Fab was cleared from the circulation more rapidly than equine F(ab')2. To evaluate safety, patients were closely observed for adverse reactions. Following a severe reaction with Haffkine antivenom all subsequent patients in this group were treated prophylactically with hydrocortisone and chlorpheniramine. Despite this, the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the Haffkine group compared with the PolongaTAb group (81% compared with 48%) and 4 patients had a severe anaphylactic reaction in the former group. In conclusion, the new antivenom is safer than Haffkine antivenom but, to avoid repeated doses, an initial dose higher than 1 g is needed in the treatment of Sri Lankan Russell's viper envenoming. The safety of this larger dose is the subject of further studies.
机译:罗素的毒蛇(Daboia russelii russelii)是斯里兰卡发病和死亡的重要原因。 1985年的一项研究表明,剂量高达20 g的Haffkine马多特异性抗癫痫药在清除抗原血症方面无效,并引起了类过敏反应的高发生率。已经针对斯里兰卡罗素毒蛇的毒液开发了一种新的单特异性绵羊Fabantivenom(Polonga TAb),为了评估其安全性和有效性,我们于1997年与目前使用的Haffkine antivenom进行了开放,随机的比较。在国内使用。罗素毒蛇咬伤后全身性痉挛的患者被随机分配接受初始静脉注射剂量的1 g Polonga TAb(n = 23)或10 g Haffkine anantnom(n = 20)。一剂Polonga TAb在22名患者中只有9名(41%)能够永久恢复血液凝结性,而13名需要重复剂量,而大多数(14/20; 70%)在服用一剂Haffkine anantnom后已恢复了凝结性。 Haffkine组中有一种趋势,可以更快地解决局部肿胀和全身表现。 Haffkine组中的蛇毒抗原血症消除得更快,并且比马F(ab')2更快地从循环中清除绵羊Fab。为了评估安全性,密切观察患者的不良反应。与Haffkine antivenom发生严重反应后,该组中所有后续患者均接受氢化可的松和扑尔敏进行预防性治疗。尽管如此,与PolongaTAb组相比,Haffkine组的不良反应发生率明显更高(81%与48%),并且前组中有4例有严重的过敏反应。总之,新的抗蛇毒血清比Haffkine抗蛇毒血清更安全,但为避免重复给药,在治疗斯里兰卡罗素毒蛇毒时需要大于1 g的初始剂量。更大剂量的安全性是进一步研究的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号