首页> 外文期刊>Surface and Interface Analysis: SIA: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films >Reevaluating the conventional approach for analyzing spectroscopic ellipsometry psi/delta versus time data. Additional statistical rigor may often be appropriate
【24h】

Reevaluating the conventional approach for analyzing spectroscopic ellipsometry psi/delta versus time data. Additional statistical rigor may often be appropriate

机译:重新评估了用于分析椭圆偏振psi / delta与时间数据的常规方法。附加的统计严格度通常可能是合适的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A standard approach for confirming the stability of thin films consists of probing them over an extended period of time by spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) and plotting the resulting psi () and delta () values versus time at a few selected wavelengths across the spectral range. In general, if and remain constant with time, or essentially constant, the material is deemed to be stable. Here, we suggest that in addition to this eyeball' approach, a statistical analysis of the data may often be appropriate. In particular, we reevaluate a set of / versus time data from a sputtered bismuth-tellurium-selenium film that appear to remain essentially constant by the traditional approach, subjecting it to a distance analysis, a principal components analysis, and a cluster analysis. The application of these statistical tools, especially to range-selected data (300-989nm), reveals previously unobserved changes, suggesting that either the film in question or the analytical approach itself had changed during the course of the measurements. Weighted distance formulas for and were also applied so that the data did not need to be range selected for the key effects to be observed. The distance approach was similarly applied (i) to a set of SE data from a thin carbon film, which revealed consistent changes in the material that were not apparent in the standard approach, and (ii) to samples that were deliberately contaminated or improperly measured. Thus, we recommend a more rigorous, statistical approach to the analysis of SE / versus time data. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:确认薄膜稳定性的标准方法包括在较长的时间内通过椭圆偏振光谱法(SE)对其进行探测,并在整个光谱范围内的几个选定波长下绘制psi()和δ()值与时间的关系曲线。通常,如果并且随时间保持恒定,或者基本恒定,则认为该材料是稳定的。在这里,我们建议,除了采取这种眼球方法外,对数据进行统计分析通常也很合适。特别是,我们重新评估了溅射的铋-碲-硒薄膜的一组/时间数据,这些薄膜似乎通过传统方法基本保持恒定,并对其进行了距离分析,主成分分析和聚类分析。这些统计工具的应用,尤其是对范围选择的数据(300-989nm)的揭示,揭示了以前未曾观察到的变化,这表明所讨论的胶片或分析方法本身在测量过程中都发生了变化。还应用了和的加权距离公式,因此无需为要观察的关键效果选择数据范围。距离方法类似地应用于(i)来自薄碳膜的一组SE数据,这揭示了标准方法中不明显的材料的一致变化,以及(ii)故意污染或测量不当的样品。因此,我们建议使用更严格的统计方法来分析SE /时间数据。版权所有(c)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号