...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology Research >Relative sensitivities of TDAR, cytokine production, and immunophenotyping assays in immunotoxicity assessment
【24h】

Relative sensitivities of TDAR, cytokine production, and immunophenotyping assays in immunotoxicity assessment

机译:TDAR,细胞因子产生和免疫表型测定在免疫毒性评估中的相对敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Additional immunotoxicity tests as part of a repeat-dose toxicity study have been recommended to improve the quality of immunotoxicity assessments. Present immunotoxicity test guidelines list many tests without concreteness of methods or principles for their use. Due to the different sensitivity and specificity of each assay, numerous different test batteries can produce diverse results and make difficult inter-laboratory comparisons. To help resolve these problems and identify some of the more sensitive tests that might be used, we established immunotoxicity in a rat model using two well-known immunosuppressants and then compared the sensitivity of three important immunotoxicity tests, i.e., measures of T-cell dependent antibody responses (TDAR), ex vivo cytokine production, and immunophenotyping. The results showed that after treatment with cyclosporin A (CsA; 20 mg kg(-1) d(-1)) or triptolide (TP; 0.8 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), production of interleukin (IL)-2, interferon (IFN)-gamma, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and the antibody to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) were significantly inhibited; in contrast, there were only weak or sporadic changes to host histopathology and hematology. With regard to phenotyping, no significant changes were noted in the ratios of CD4(+) : CD8(+) cells in the treated hosts. Taken together, the results here suggest to us that cytokine production and the KLH TDAR assay are very sensitive parameters to define an agent as immunotoxic, while immunophenotyping and histopathology - while being more expensive/time-consuming - appear to be less sensitive options for an individual assessing the immunotoxic potential of a given test agent.
机译:已建议将其他免疫毒性测试作为重复剂量毒性研究的一部分,以提高免疫毒性评估的质量。当前的免疫毒性测试指南列出了许多测试,但没有具体的使用方法或原则。由于每种测定法的灵敏度和特异性不同,许多不同的测试电池可产生不同的结果,并使实验室间的比较变得困难。为了帮助解决这些问题并确定一些可能使用的更敏感的测试,我们使用两种众所周知的免疫抑制剂在大鼠模型中建立了免疫毒性,然后比较了三种重要的免疫毒性测试的敏感性,即对T细胞依赖性的测量抗体反应(TDAR),离体细胞因子产生和免疫表型。结果表明,用环孢菌素A(CsA; 20 mg kg(-1)d(-1))或雷公藤内酯(TP; 0.8 mg kg(-1)d(-1))处理后,产生白介素(IL) -2,干扰素(IFN)-γ,肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和钥孔血蓝蛋白(KLH)抗体被显着抑制;相反,宿主组织病理学和血液学只有微小的或零星的变化。关于表型,在治疗的宿主中,CD4(+):CD8(+)细胞的比例没有显着变化。综上所述,这里的结果向我们表明,细胞因子的产生和KLH TDAR测定法是非常敏感的参数,可将一种试剂定义为免疫毒性,而免疫表型和组织病理学(虽然更昂贵/更耗时)似乎是一种较不敏感的选择。个人评估给定测试剂的免疫毒性潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号