...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >CORRELATING SITE-SCALE ERODIBILITY PARAMETERS FROM JET EROSION TESTS TO SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
【24h】

CORRELATING SITE-SCALE ERODIBILITY PARAMETERS FROM JET EROSION TESTS TO SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

机译:从射流侵蚀测试到土壤物理性质的相关场地规模电蚀率参数的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the most commonly used methods of measuring erodibility parameters, i.e., critical shear stress (tau(c)) and erodibility coefficient (k(d)), of cohesive soils is the Jet Erosion Test (JET). While numerous factors influence the erodibility parameters, the JET provides an in situ measurement technique. However, in many cases where erodibility parameters are required for simulating channel erosion processes, the erodibility parameters are not characterized in situ but estimated empirically based on soil physical properties with relationships that may not be good predictors for all stream-banks. The objectives of this study were to investigate the correlation between the erodibility parameters measured with JETs and soil physical properties at a site-specific scale and across three unique streambanks. A total of 74 JETs were conducted within visually homogeneous streambank layers at three sites in Oklahoma along with measurements of soil physical parameters such as texture, bulk density, moisture content, and water and soil temperatures. At the site scale, tau(c) and k(d) varied by up to three orders of magnitude. Neither multiple linear regressions nor principal components regressions suggested any consistent strongly correlated variables. Therefore, erodibility parameters measured in this study could not be predicted based solely on soil physical properties. It was concluded that tau(c) and k(d) must be measured in situ and cannot be estimated from empirical relationships due to the heterogeneous nature of soil and the variability in subaerial processes, even within visually homogeneous streambank layers. More research is needed in order to correlate erodibility parameters to other soil parameters and quantify the role of subaerial processes, such as seepage, soil desiccation, and freeze-thaw cycles, on erodibility in order to incorporate spatial variability of erodibility parameters into stability and channel evolution models.
机译:侵蚀性参数最常用的测量粘性参数的方法之一是喷射侵蚀试验(JET),它是粘性土的临界剪切应力(tau(c))和腐蚀系数(k(d))。尽管许多因素影响可蚀性参数,但JET提供了一种现场测量技术。但是,在许多情况下,需要使用可蚀性参数来模拟河道侵蚀过程,可蚀性参数不是原位表征的,而是根据土壤物理性质凭经验估算的,而其关系可能并不是所有河岸的良好预测指标。这项研究的目的是在特定地点范围内和三个独特的河岸上调查用JETs测量的可蚀性参数与土壤物理性质之间的相关性。在俄克拉荷马州的三个地点的视觉均质的河岸层中进行了总共74个JET,并测量了土壤物理参数,例如质地,堆积密度,水分含量以及水和土壤温度。在站点规模上,tau(c)和k(d)的变化幅度最高可达三个数量级。多元线性回归和主成分回归均未显示任何一致的强相关变量。因此,仅基于土壤物理特性无法预测本研究中测得的侵蚀性参数。结论是,tau(c)和k(d)必须在原位进行测量,由于土壤的异质性和空中过程的可变性,即使在视觉上均质的河岸层内,也无法根据经验关系进行估算。为了使可蚀性参数与其他土壤参数相关联,并量化地下过程(如渗流,土壤干燥和冻融循环)对可蚀性的作用,需要进行更多研究,以便将可蚀性参数的空间变异性纳入稳定性和通道演化模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号