首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Spatial modeling and variability analysis for modeling and prediction of soil and crop canopy coverage using multispectral imagery from an airborne remote sensing system.
【24h】

Spatial modeling and variability analysis for modeling and prediction of soil and crop canopy coverage using multispectral imagery from an airborne remote sensing system.

机译:使用机载遥感系统的多光谱图像对土壤和作物冠层覆盖范围进行建模和预测的空间建模和变异性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spatial modeling and variability analysis of soil and crop canopy coverage has been accomplished using aerial multispectral images. Multispectral imagery was acquired using an MS-4100 multispectral camera at different flight altitudes over a 40 ha cotton field. After the acquired images were geo-registered and processed, spatial relationships between the aerial images and ground-based soil conductivity and NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) measurements were estimated and compared using two spatial analysis approaches (model-driven spatial regression and data-driven geostatistics) and one non-spatial approach (multiple linear regression). Comparison of the three approaches indicated that OLS (ordinary least squares) solutions from multiple linear regression models performed worst in modeling ground-based soil conductivity and NDVI with high AIC (Akaike information criterion) (-668.3 to 2980) and BIC (Bayesian information criterion) (-642.4 to 3006) values. Spatial regression and geostatistics performed much better in modeling soil conductivity, with low AIC (2698 to 2820) and BIC (2732 to 2850) values. For modeling ground-based NDVI, the AIC and BIC values were -681.7 and -652.1, respectively, for spatial error regression and -679.8 and -646.5, respectively, for geostatistics, which were only moderate improvements over OLS (-668.3 and -642.4). Validation of the geostatistical models indicated that they could predict soil conductivity much better than the corresponding multiple linear regression models, with lower RMSE (root mean squared error) values (0.096 to 0.186, compared to 0.146 to 0.306). Results indicated that the aerial images could be used for spatial modeling and prediction, and they were informative for spatial prediction of ground soil and canopy coverage variability. The methods used for this study could help deliver baseline data for crop monitoring with remote sensing and establish a procedure for general crop management.
机译:使用空中多光谱图像已经完成了土壤和作物冠层覆盖的空间建模和变异性分析。使用MS-4100多光谱相机在40公顷的棉田上不同的飞行高度下获取多光谱图像。在对获取的图像进行地理配准和处理后,估算并比较了航空图像与地面土壤电导率和NDVI(归一化植被指数)测量值之间的空间关系,并使用了两种空间分析方法(模型驱动的空间回归和数据驱动)驱动的地统计学)和一种非空间方法(多元线性回归)。三种方法的比较表明,来自多个线性回归模型的OLS(普通最小二乘)解决方案在以高AIC(Akaike信息标准)(-668.3至2980)和BIC(贝叶斯信息标准)为基础的土壤电导率和NDVI建模方面表现最差)(-642.4至3006)值。空间回归和地统计学在模拟土壤电导率方面表现更好,AIC(2698至2820)和BIC(2732至2850)较低。对于基于地面的NDVI建模,对于空间误差回归,AIC和BIC值分别为-681.7和-652.1,对于地统计学,AIC和BIC值分别为-679.8和-646.5,仅比OLS(-668.3和-642.4)适度提高)。地统计学模型的验证表明,与相应的多元线性回归模型相比,它们能更好地预测土壤电导率,其RMSE(均方根误差)值较低(0.096至0.186,而0.146至0.306)。结果表明,航空影像可用于空间建模和预测,对地面土壤和冠层覆盖变化的空间预测具有指导意义。这项研究所使用的方法可以帮助提供基线数据,用于遥感监测作物,并建立总体作物管理程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号