首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Effects of a new polysaccharide-based amendment on furrow irrigation infiltration and erosion.
【24h】

Effects of a new polysaccharide-based amendment on furrow irrigation infiltration and erosion.

机译:新的基于多糖的改良剂对沟灌入渗和侵蚀的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Controlling soil erosion on furrow-irrigated fields is essential to maintain productivity and reduce off-site impacts. Identifying effective alternatives to polyacrylamide (PAM) is desired for continued, affordable irrigation erosion control. We compared the effectiveness of a new polysaccharide/PAM amendment with water-soluble, high molecular weight, anionic PAM in two furrow-irrigated field tests in southern Idaho, USA. Test 1 evaluated three rates of the polysaccharide/PAM amendment (6, 12, and 18 mg litre-1 of polysaccharide/PAM), two rates of PAM (2 and 10 mg litre-1 of PAM), 10 mg litre-1 polysaccharide, and a control during two irrigations in a fallow field. Treatments were applied as a solution with furrow inflow water during irrigation advance. Test 1 results indicated that polysaccharide IPAM amendment could improve infiltration and reduce sediment loss compared to untreated furrows, but its effectiveness seemed to diminish when amendment application stopped. Polysaccharide alone did not significantly effect infiltration, runoff, or sediment loss compared to the control for either irrigation, whereas the polysaccharide/PAM amendment significantly increased infiltration and reduced sediment loss for one irrigation. Test 2 compared polysaccharide/PAM amendment and PAM, both applied at either 2 mg litre-1 (active ingredient) continually during irrigation (dissolved treatments) or as a 20 g per furrow of dry material near the furrow inflow point (patch treatments), during four irrigations on a dry bean field. Both amendments significantly increased cumulative infiltration and decreased cumulative runoff and sediment loss compared to untreated furrows. Dissolved polysaccharide/PAM increased cumulative infiltration 19% compared to the control, while dissolved PAM, patch polysaccharide/PAM, and patch PAM treatments increased cumulative infiltration 13, 11, and 7%, respectively, compared to the control. Dissolved and patch PAM and dissolved and patch polysaccharide IPAM treatments significantly reduced cumulative sediment loss 98, 90, 65, and 49%, respectively, compared to the untreated furrows. These test results indicate that the polysaccharide/PAM amendment can be used as an alternative, albeit less effective, to PAM for reducing sediment loss from furrow-irrigated fields.
机译:控制沟灌田的土壤侵蚀对于维持生产力和减少场外影响至关重要。为了持续,负担得起的灌溉侵蚀控制,需要找到聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)的有效替代品。我们在美国爱达荷州南部的两次犁沟灌溉田间试验中,将一种新的多糖/ PAM改良剂与水溶性高分子量阴离子型PAM的效果进行了比较。测试1评估了三种比率的多糖/ PAM修正剂(多糖/ PAM分别为6、12和18 mg litre-1),两种比率的PAM(PAM的浓度为2和10 mg litre-1),10 mg的升1多糖。 ,以及在休耕地进行两次灌溉时的控制。在灌溉进行期间,采用沟灌水作为溶液进行处理。试验1的结果表明,与未处理的犁沟相比,多糖IPAM改良剂可以改善渗透并减少泥沙流失,但是当停止应用改良剂时,其有效性似乎下降。与两种灌溉方式相比,单独使用多糖都没有显着影响入渗,径流或沉积物流失,而一次灌溉时多糖/ PAM改良剂显着增加了入渗量并减少了沉积物流失。测试2比较了多糖/ PAM修正剂和PAM,二者均在灌溉期间(溶解处理)连续施用2 mg litre-1(活性成分),或者在犁沟流入点附近以每犁沟干物质20 g施用(补丁处理),在干豆田的四次灌溉期间。与未处理的犁沟相比,两种改良剂均显着增加了累积入渗量,并减少了累积径流和沉积物损失。与对照相比,溶解的多糖/ PAM使累积浸润增加了19%,而与对照相比,溶解的PAM,膜多糖/ PAM和膜PAM处理分别使累积浸润增加了13、11和7%。与未处理的犁沟相比,溶解和贴片PAM以及溶解和贴片多糖IPAM处理分别显着减少了98%,90%,65%和49%的累积沉积物损失。这些测试结果表明,多糖/ PAM改性剂可以替代PAM,尽管效果不佳,但可以减少犁沟灌溉区的泥沙流失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号